Corporate Law : SC judgment: Anticipatory bail should be granted sparingly in economic offences, especially for those evading legal processes. Acc...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court quashes rape case, citing consensual relationship from the beginning despite a promise of marriage. Court emphasizes...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court notes UP rule of law issues. West UP, with most pending cases, lacks a High Court Bench, forcing long, costly travel...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court acquits man convicted for abetting wife's suicide, stating harassment allegations insufficient for Section 306 IPC c...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rules in Ashish Kakkar case that an arrest memo does not fulfill the legal requirement of furnishing grounds of arre...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Income Tax : Government addresses Supreme Court judgment on tax exemptions for clergy and its implications on Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) u...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rejects regularisation of illegal constructions, irrespective of occupancy or investments, and calls for action agai...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court Collegium recommends three advocates—Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder—for ...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Corporate Law : SC rules Sub-Registrars cannot verify vendor’s title during registration; Rule 55A(i) of Tamil Nadu Registration Rules declared ...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court declares Rule 55A(i) of Registration Rules ultra vires, stating Sub-Registrar's duty is procedural, not title verifi...
Corporate Law : SC held that a duly signed cheque, even if filled by someone other than drawer, can invoke Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments A...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rules in Batliboi v HPCL that arbitral damages must reflect actual loss, not be a windfall. Discusses formulae flaws...
Income Tax : Supreme Court sets aside High Court ruling in S.M. Overseas tax case, restores ITAT order on reassessment under Sections 147/148 o...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
SC quashes FIR against Nirankar Nath Pandey for disproportionate assets from 1996 to 2020, citing economic changes and the importance of dynamic asset assessment.
Supreme Court directs compensation, audits, and pollution control measures in Vellore river case, aiming to address tannery pollution and ecological damage.
The Supreme Court ruled that extra-judicial confessions must be true, voluntary, and free from coercion to establish guilt, overturning a Bombay High Court verdict.
Supreme Court rules that company employees cannot be held liable for GST fraud penalties under Sections 122(1-A) & 137. Case against Maersk employee dismissed.
Supreme Court upholds CESTAT ruling granting service tax refund to Flemingo Travel Retail Ltd., confirming duty-free shops are beyond Indian customs frontiers.
Supreme Court held that Chief Controlling Revenue Authority lacked any express statutory power to review or recall its own decision. Thus, once refund is granted by CCRA it cannot review the same and reject refund application.
The Supreme Court criticized trial courts for lacking courage in granting bail and urged High Courts to act judiciously, emphasizing the need for fair discretion.
Supreme Court overturns Bombay High Court order, addressing delay condonation and interpretation of ‘sufficient cause’ under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Supreme Court quashes a workplace harassment case, ruling the allegations stemmed from a civil dispute, with no criminal basis, and were filed with malicious intent.
Supreme Court held that the agreement between the oil marketing companies indicates that the price of petroleum products agreed under MoU is not a normal price and, therefore, is not a transaction value. Appeal allowed on the ground of extended period.
