Income Tax : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings (2023) on income tax issues. Highlights of key cases, analysis, and implications....
Income Tax : Explore sections 68 to 69D of Income Tax Act 1961, covering unexplained cash credits, investments, and more. Learn about legal pro...
Income Tax : Explore Section 68 of the Income Tax Act with our comprehensive guide on cash credits. Learn about its purpose, scope, and legal f...
Income Tax : Discover simplified taxation scheme under Section 44AD of Income Tax Act. Learn eligibility criteria, exemptions, and key insights...
Income Tax : Unlock the intricacies of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, unraveling the nuances of unexplained cash credits. Delve into its ame...
Income Tax : Explore the detailed analysis of ITO Vs Axisline Investment Consultants Pvt. Ltd. case where ITAT Kolkata deleted Rs. 1.54 crore a...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held in ITO Vs Happy Structure Pvt. Ltd. that share application amount cannot be added twice under Section 68 of In...
Income Tax : Satyam Smertex pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata): Addition made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A) are based on conjectures and surmises...
Income Tax : If AO adopts a plausible view, even if two views are possible, the assessment cannot be deemed erroneous merely because the PCIT h...
Income Tax : Assessee has placed sufficient documents and materials on record to prove identity and creditworthiness of shareholders and genuin...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of proceedings u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act based on seized dumb documents found in the premises of third party is unsustainable in law as the seized documents are merely loose sheets not forming part of the books of account of the assessee and that they do not constitute admissible evidence.
ITAT Delhi held that addition of cash credits in various bank accounts deleted by CIT(A) without verifying the persons/firm/Companies from whom the alleged amount has been credited is bad-in-law. Accordingly, matter resorted to the file of AO.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 towards unsecured loan amount unjustified as identity and creditworthiness of creditors and genuineness of transaction duly proved by way of documentary evidences.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that provisions of section 68 of the Income Tax Act doesn’t attract as unsecured loan availed was repaid in the next financial year through cheque payments to the creditor and bank statement thereof was filed.
ITAT Mumbai sets aside CIT(A) order in Vimal Kishor Shah vs ITO case, ruling purchases reflected in books can’t be treated as unexplained investment.
ITAT Delhi deletes section 68 addition in B N Public School vs ACIT, confirming no separate PAN or return needed for institution owned by trust/society.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit unsustainable as genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of lender duly proved.
ITAT Delhi held that addition based on incriminating material found during the search carried out of ‘some other person’ i.e. third person/ party and assessing the same by invoking provision of section 147 instead of section 153C is unsustainable.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as nature and source of credit duly explained by the assessee.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition of unexplained investment u/s 68 sustained as genuineness of transaction in shares not proved. Further, SEBI also found manipulative trade executed in entities to whom shares were sold by the assessee.
