Income Tax : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings (2023) on income tax issues. Highlights of key cases, analysis, and implications....
Income Tax : Explore sections 68 to 69D of Income Tax Act 1961, covering unexplained cash credits, investments, and more. Learn about legal pro...
Income Tax : Explore Section 68 of the Income Tax Act with our comprehensive guide on cash credits. Learn about its purpose, scope, and legal f...
Income Tax : Discover simplified taxation scheme under Section 44AD of Income Tax Act. Learn eligibility criteria, exemptions, and key insights...
Income Tax : Unlock the intricacies of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, unraveling the nuances of unexplained cash credits. Delve into its ame...
Income Tax : Dhanpat Raj Khatri Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur) If the explanation based on accounts supported by affidavit is not controverted, no addit...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court quashes Income Tax reassessment notice against Deepak Natvarlal Pankhiyani HUF, citing lack of fresh evidence s...
Income Tax : Explore the full text of the ITAT Ahmedabad order where Neo Structo Construction Pvt. Ltd. successfully challenges a ₹3 Cr addit...
Income Tax : Read the full text of the ITAT Kolkata order in Keshav Shroff Vs ITO (AY 2016-17). Analysis shows why mere suspicion isn't enough ...
Income Tax : Read ITAT Kolkata's full text order on Sachdev Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO. Learn why old loans converted into share allotment were dee...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
Mere reliance on statements without corroborative evidence and denying cross-examination rights cannot justify additions for share capital and share premium under Section 68
The ITAT Bangalore ruled that income tax additions can’t be based solely on unsubstantiated loose slips, emphasizing the need for corroborative material evidence.
Rajasthan HC dismisses Income Tax Dept’s appeal, upholds ITAT decision deleting additions on capital gain from share sale. Read the full judgment here.
Read about Wisley Real Estate Pvt. Ltd Vs ITAT Kolkata. Detailed analysis of the case where creditworthiness of share subscribers was proven, resulting in deletion of Rs. 1,76,87,500/- addition under section 68 of IT Act.
Learn about the penalty of Rs. 31.83 Lakh imposed by the MCA for issuing shares in physical mode instead of DEMAT mode in the Biogenomics case.
In the case of Wellman Logistics Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT, ITAT Kolkata deletes income tax addition u/s 68, proving creditworthiness of share subscribers and genuineness of transactions with supported documents.
ITAT Delhi rules against Section 41(1) addition when no cessation of liability occurs, directing cancellation of a demand in the case of Late Sh. Mahender Kumar Mittal vs. ITO.
Detailed analysis of ITAT Mumbai case of Parag Motilal Savla vs ITO, focusing on lack of substantial evidence for cash loan allegations.
Delhi High Courts ruling in PCIT Vs. Pavitra Realcon Pvt. Ltd. highlights that undisclosed income assessment cant be based solely on statements made during a search.
ITAT Delhi rules that the accepted investment source by AO cannot be rectified under Section 154, quashing the income tax assessment order.
