Income Tax : Understand TDS on rent with this guide. Learn about Section 194IB & 195 of the Income Tax Act, their differences, rates, and compl...
Income Tax : Unravel the complexities of Section 195 in India's Income Tax Act. Explore TDS rates, compliance steps, and strategies for non-res...
Income Tax : Learn about Section 194-IA and essential aspects of TDS when buying property in India. Explore deductor-deductee roles, exemption ...
Income Tax : Learn about Form 15CA and 15CB: Crucial for foreign remittances and tax compliance. A complete guide for taxpayers....
Income Tax : Learn about tax procedures and implications when an NRI sells property in India to a resident. Explore how to reduce TDS and obtai...
Income Tax : Direct & Indirect Taxes : Monthly Updates Date & Time – 3rd December 2022 (Time:11 a.m to 12:30 p.m) Tax Guru is Organiz...
Income Tax : Clarification on certain procedural and technical issues regarding the Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016 (IDS) under section 119 of t...
Income Tax : Finance Act, 2012 extended the obligation to withhold taxes to non- residents irrespective of whether the non-resident has -...
Income Tax : Government has recently modified the Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account Transactions) Rules, 2000 and the Liberalized Re...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court judgement on Vodafone tax case seems to have opened a Pandora's box with exporters too expressing reservation on...
Corporate Law : Explore the implications of creditors initiating insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors under Section 95(1) of IBC in ...
Income Tax : In a case before ITAT Delhi, it was ruled that payment made overseas for tariff information does not constitute 'FTS', hence no TD...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata ruled that TDS under section 195 is not required for foreign commission payments and liquidated damages are capital r...
Income Tax : Understand the grounds of appeal in the case against the final assessment order under the Income Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2017-18, in...
Income Tax : Assessee was incorporated in Japan and was in the business of providing telecommunication services. Assessee provided fixed, mobil...
Income Tax : it has been decided that no such request for Form 15E for certificates under section 195(2) & 195(7) for a particular Financial Ye...
Income Tax : CBDT vide notification No. 18/2021-Income Tax, Dated: March 16, 2021 inserted new rule 29BA. Application for grant of certificate ...
Income Tax : Clarification on orders dated 31.03.2020 and 03.04.2020 issued under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by CBDT vid...
Income Tax : In case of pending applications for lower/nil rate of TDS/TCS for F.Y. 2019-20, the Assessing Officers have been directed to dispo...
Income Tax : CBDT Order on issue of certificates for lower rate/nil deduction/collection of TDS or TCS uls 195, 197 and 206C (9) when Assesee w...
Income Tax needs to be deducted at source by the purchaser on payment against purchase of an immovable property from a non-resident following the guideline as below: 1. Who is a non-resident under Income Tax Act? Ans. The residential Status is determined for every financial year, i.e., the period from 1st April to 31st March […]
Payment to parent company for copyrighted software on principle to principle basis cannot be treated royalty and TDS not applicable on payment to parent company not having PE in India.
Since there was no separate payment made for the purchase of software embedded in mobile phones, therefore, no TDS to be deducted under Section 195 for software embedded in mobile phones imported by assessee during the previous year.
As per section 195(1) of Income Tax Act, any person responsible to for paying to a non-resident, not being a company, or to a foreign company, any interest or any other sum chargeable to tax shall, at the time of credit of such income or at the time of payment, whichever is earlier, deduct income-tax thereon at the rates as applicable.
Please also refer the case JLC Electromet Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur). I’m trying to analyse only some of the provisions applicable, only for understanding purpose. As per Section 195 of Income Tax Act, any person who makes payment to non-resident by way of interest (except the interest as specified in Sections 194LB or […]
Public consultation on the proposal for amendment of Income-tax Rules 1962, to inset new rule 29BA and Form 15E, to give effect to the amendment in section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) vide Finance (No.2) Act 2019- reg.
Section 206AA does not override provisions of section 90(2) and in case of payment made to non-resident, assessee correctly applied rate of tax prescribed under concerned DTAAs and not as per section 206AA because provisions of the DTAAs were more beneficial and DTAA acquired primacy in such case.
Commission paid to foreign agents for procuring export orders could not be treated as income taxable in India when parameters of DTAAs were applied to transactions in question. Also non-resident agents did not have PE or business connection in India. Therefore, impugned payment could not be held as taxable in the hands of non-resident agents in India and, therefore, liability to withhold tax under section 195 did not arise.
Consideration paid by assessee for services rendered by non-resident were purely in the nature of procurement services and could not be characterized as ‘managerial’, ‘technical’ or ‘consultancy’ services and thus, could not be classified as fee for technical services and accordingly, not liable for deduction of tax at source under section 195.
Services rendered by foreign concern for introducing a client did not make-available any technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to assessee, therefore, related payment did not fall within the realm of “Fees for included services” as envisaged in Article 12 of the Indo-US, DTAA and payment made to foreign concern constituted its business profits within the meaning of Article 7 Indo-USA DTAA, and in the absence of any Permanent Establishment of the said foreign concern in India no taxability arose and, therefore, assessee was not liable to withhold tax under section 195.
