Income Tax : Explore tax implications under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) and reassessment norms in property transactions. Judicial rulings emphasize e...
Income Tax : Explore key court rulings on reassessment under Section 148 post-2021 amendments, covering procedural changes, taxpayer rights, an...
Income Tax : Written submission against wrong cash deposit notice under Section 148A(b), highlighting errors and lack of independent inquiry....
Income Tax : The Supreme Court’s Rajeev Bansal case clarified the validity of reassessment notices for AY 2013-14 to 2018-19 and introduced t...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court's rulings clarify reassessment procedures under the Income Tax Act, addressing validity, TOLA implications, and ...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Corporate Law : Non- extension of the Time Barring Date for assessment of reopened cases and issuance of the notices for reopening – difficu...
Income Tax : Patna High Court held that notice must be supported by reasons. Accordingly, since notice issued under section 148 of the Income T...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court dismisses Bhag Chand Jangid' s plea against tax assessment due to delayed challenge of the initial order. Alt...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that funds remitted from foreign sources into NRE accounts are not taxable in India unless there is material t...
Income Tax : Patna High Court held that taxpayer will not be eligible for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 [DTVSV Scheme] against notice...
Income Tax : Held that the AO seeks to disallow expenses on account of doubting the genuineness for the reason that the same were not incurred ...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
Income Tax : Salient features of new Section 148 to 151A 'i.e. assessment/reassessment procedure of Income Escaping Assessment...
Delhi High Court voids tax reassessment. Variance between initial notice and subsequent order denied taxpayer fair opportunity to respond.
Patna High Court held that Faceless Assessment Procedure as prescribed under section 144B of the Income Tax Act is duly followed and in course of faceless assessment at every stage approval from competent authorities have been obtained.
Bombay HC quashes tax notices issued to deceased Amjad Ahmed Shaikh. Court emphasizes notices to dead are void, allowing fresh action. The court dismissed revenue’s explanation regarding correspondence with the chartered accountant, stating it did not justify issuing notices to a deceased person.
Rajasthan High Court held that, in terms of section 151A of the Income Tax Act, Jurisdictional Assessing Officer [JAO] doesn’t have jurisdiction to issue notices under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, notices u/s. 148 are liable to be quashed.
Bombay High Court quashes income tax notices to Srimani Basu due to improper service from address discrepancy, grants fresh hearing opportunity.
Calcutta High Court quashes reassessment, ruling IBC resolution plans override Income Tax Act, protecting companies in CIRP.
Gujarat High Court held that passing of order u/s. 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act without considering reply filed by the petitioner by not granting adjournment time as prescribed u/s. 148A(b). Thus, order quashed and matter remanded back.
ITAT Delhi held that re-assessment notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and sent to unrelated e-mail address is regarded as never served to assessee and hence re-assessment order framed thereon is nonest and bad in law.
ITAT Hyderabad sends ₹3.56 crore income addition case back to CIT(A) for reconsideration, imposes penalty for non-compliance.
Delhi HC rules reassessment invalid as assessee was not informed about alleged bogus entity. Tax authorities must follow due process under Section 148A of IT Act.
