Sponsored
    Follow Us:

high court judgments

Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.

Latest Articles


J&K&L HC Quashes Preventive Detention of Nazir Ahmad Ronga

Corporate Law : The J&K&L HC quashed Nazir Ahmad Ronga’s detention under the Public Safety Act, citing vague allegations and lack of evidence, s...

March 18, 2025 135 Views 0 comment Print

Unsigned & DIN-Less GST Orders are Invalid: AP HC Ruling

Goods and Services Tax : AP High Court invalidates unsigned GST orders without DIN, citing CBIC guidelines. Learn key legal takeaways and compliance requir...

March 18, 2025 591 Views 0 comment Print

Analysis of Notifications and Circulars for Week ending 16th March 2025

CA, CS, CMA : Summary of tax and regulatory updates: income tax bonds, GST rulings, SEBI amendments, customs tariffs, and DGFT trade policy chan...

March 18, 2025 3624 Views 0 comment Print

Assumption That Indian Woman Won’t File False Sexual Assault Case Incorrect: Kerala HC

Corporate Law : Kerala HC quashes rape case, stressing case-specific analysis of allegations. Assumption that women won’t file false sexual assa...

March 17, 2025 270 Views 0 comment Print

GST में Voluntary Payment या Coercion? Karnataka HC का फैसला

Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC ने DGGI की ₹2.5 करोड़ की वसूली को अवैध ठहराया। जान...

March 11, 2025 510 Views 0 comment Print


Latest News


Latest Case Law Related to IBC 2016: October to December 2024

Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...

February 13, 2025 519 Views 0 comment Print

Latest Case Law Related to IBC – April to June 2024

Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...

August 14, 2024 777 Views 0 comment Print

GST payable on interest component of EMI of Credit Card loan: Calcutta HC

Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...

August 10, 2022 3096 Views 0 comment Print

Gurugugram CA arrest by GST Dept. – Submission by Dept. in Court

Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...

May 25, 2022 90438 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi HC Issues Practice Directions to Dispense with Physical Signatures on Daily Court Orders

Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...

April 29, 2022 939 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Delay Beyond 1 Month in GST Appeals Not Condonable: Chhattisgarh HC

Goods and Services Tax : Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Nandan Steels’ appeal against GST credit denial, ruling that delay beyond the prescribed limit...

March 19, 2025 84 Views 0 comment Print

Proper Service of Notice Crucial for GST Assessment Validity: Madras HC

Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court invalidates assessment order in M.Vimalraj Vs Union of India due to lack of proper notice service under GST Act....

March 19, 2025 96 Views 0 comment Print

HC Quashes Writ on GST Penalty for Non-Claim of Goods, Directs Alternative Remedy

Goods and Services Tax : The Allahabad HC dismissed HDB Financial's writ petition challenging a ₹5.4 lakh GST penalty, advising the petitioner to pursue ...

March 19, 2025 48 Views 0 comment Print

Separate GST Orders should be issued for each year Despite Composite SCN: Kerala HC

Goods and Services Tax : Kerala High Court addresses GST show cause notice to Lakshmi Mobile, focusing on separate orders and hearing opportunities....

March 19, 2025 78 Views 0 comment Print

ITC Reversal: Madras HC allows opportunity on payment of 25% of disputed taxes

Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court resolves Tvl. Arumugasamy tax case. 25% disputed tax payment allows a new hearing. Read the full order summary. ...

March 19, 2025 72 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Notifications


Bombay High Court Enforces Video Conferencing Rules

Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...

December 19, 2024 612 Views 0 comment Print

CBDT Revises Monetary Limits for Tax Income Tax Appeals

Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...

September 17, 2024 11856 Views 0 comment Print

New Video Conferencing Protocols Issued by Delhi High Court

Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...

May 20, 2024 1215 Views 0 comment Print

Instructions for AO after Adverse observations of Allahabad HC

Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...

August 7, 2022 12288 Views 2 comments Print

Delhi HC exempts lawyers from wearing gowns

Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...

February 25, 2022 3297 Views 0 comment Print


Contravention of s. 11(5) have no bearing on renewal U/s. 80G(5)

December 13, 2001 688 Views 0 comment Print

Even if the ground about contravention of the provisions of Section 11(5) of the Act is validly taken by the respondent, the same would have a bearing only at the point of time of the assessment of the petitioner-trust and would not be a material consideration in so far as granting of approval under Section 80G(5) of the Act is concerned.

Penalty only on Income determined by AO in excess of Income in return filed U/s. 158BC

September 20, 2001 939 Views 0 comment Print

Explore the Kerala High Court judgment in CIT vs. Shri. C. Najeeb regarding penalty on income determined under Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act. Discover key questions of law, such as whether the Tribunal’s decision to levy income tax on 15% of total receipts is correct. Dive into the intricacies of assessment and penalty proceedings, including insights on undisclosed income, civil liability, and the interpretation of Section 158BFA. Uncover the court’s findings, providing clarity on the computation of undisclosed income and the imposition of penalties in this significant tax case.

Ram Singh And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others – Allahabad High Court

August 11, 2000 3082 Views 0 comment Print

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in fact the respondents had no Jurisdiction to seize the trucks and he has claimed damages. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is correct. It has been repeatedly held by several Division Benches of this Court that trucks cannot be seized under the U. P. Trade-tax Act e.g., in the case of M/s. D. B. Timber Merchant, Ballia v. Commissioner of Sales-tax and another, 1992 UPTC 18, M/s. M. S. Freight Carriers and another v. Sales Tax Officer, Check Post, Ghaziabad, 1992 UPTC 273, M/s. Freight Carriers of India, Calcutta v. Deputy Commissioner (Executive), Sales Tax, Ghaziabad and others, 1992 UPTC 604, etc.

Estate of Ambalal Sarabhai vs CIT (Gujarat High Court)

July 4, 2000 1305 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has referred the following questions in respect of the asst. yrs. 1972-73 and 1973-74 for the consideration of the High Court under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, from the Tribunal’s order dt. 18th August 1981, and 20th August 1983, the later being question on the ground which was raised but through oversight not decided in the earlier order by the Tribunal.

CIT vs J. K. Investor (Bombay) Ltd. (Bombay High Court)

June 5, 2000 1323 Views 0 comment Print

The short point which arises for consideration in this appeal is : Whether notional interest on interest-free deposit received by the assessee against letting of property could be taken into account in cases falling under section 23(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) In other words, whether notional interest would form part of actual rent received or receivable under section 23(1)(b) ?

Gujarat Gas Ltd vs. JCIT (2000) – Gujarat High Court- 245 ITR 84

April 18, 2000 2337 Views 0 comment Print

In our opinion, the view which we are taking is also fortified by the proviso to s. 119 of the Act which specifically provides that the Board cannot issue instructions to the IT authority to make a particular assessment or to dispose of a particular case in a particular manner as well as not to interfere with the discretion of the CIT(A) in exercise of his appellate functions.

Penalty on Declaration of additional income to buy peace with Department?

July 20, 1999 5485 Views 0 comment Print

Shorn of all details, it emerges that the assessee first filed his returns for the assessment years 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86 and 1986-87 showing income ranging between Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 12,000. Later action under Section 132 was taken against him which led to reopening of the assessment. A notice under Section 148 was served on him

A married lady of reputed family is expected to own 500 gms of ornaments

July 8, 1999 1773 Views 0 comment Print

As per the CBDT Circular discussed in the case of Smt. Pati Devi vs. ITO; 240 ITR 727 Karnatka 500gm, jewellery is expected in the possession of a married lady and that much of ornaments cannot be seized. If we go with the CBDT Circular dated 11.05.1994 and the ratio laid down in the case of Smt. Pati Devi (supra), then each lady is expected to own 500gm. ornaments.

Sales amount by itself cannot represent income of assessee who has not disclosed sales

April 20, 1999 3993 Views 0 comment Print

It cannot be a matter of an argument that the amount of sales by itself cannot represent the income of the assessee who has not disclosed the sales. The sales only represented the price received by the seller of the goods for the acquisition of which it has already incurred the cost. It is the realisation of excess over the cost incurred that only forms part of the profit

Prem Chand Bansal and Sons Vs. Income Tax Officer, (237 ITR 65) (Delhi)

October 9, 1998 1022 Views 0 comment Print

The case of the petitioner interalia was that there was a change in law as brought about by the decision of the Supreme Court. The Delhi High Court while holding that in considering a delay condonation application facts and circumstances of the each case are required to be considered, held that the facts of the case warranted condonation of delay of 25 days.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31