Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Adithya Builders and Developers Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 21032 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/12/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Adithya Builders and Developers Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

In a major relief to the Adithya Builders and Developers, the Banglore Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Service Tax Levy depends on services rendered, not on basis of agreements where no payment received by service provider.

The appellant, M/s. Adithya Builders and Developers has been engaged in selling of land, upon providing adequate infrastructure facilities; in this case, the appellant had entered into an agreement with the Government Employees House Building Co-operative Society Ltd., Mysore for carrying out various activities namely, procurement for land from farmers, getting land thus procured converted from agricultural land to non-agricultural land, seeking various government permissions and approvals, necessary till formation of residential layouts etc.

The appellant submitted that during the period from April 2011 to March 2016 (period in dispute), the appellant had only received the amount from the society, which pertains to the phase – I activities and that the entire amount received was spent by them for the purchase of land and payment of government fees. He further submitted that during the disputed period, the appellant did not provide any service nor did any physical activity on the agricultural land either before or after conversion into non-agricultural land.

The coram of Judicial Member, S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member, P. Anjani Kumar held that the activities undertaken by the appellant pursuant to the agreements entered into with the society will not fall under the taxing net for levy of service tax up to the period 01.07.2012. Similarly, the services provided by the appellant would also not fall under the purview and scope of the definition of “service” as per Section 65B (44) ibid for the period post 01.07.2012, onwards inasmuch as such definition clause has specifically excluded the activity of transfer of title in goods or immoveable property by way of sale etc. Hence, mere procurement of land from the farmers and getting necessary approval from the government authorities will not create a tax liability under the taxable category of “service”.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031