Mobilization advance is not an advance towards provision of services

Gammon India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)

Mobilization advance is not an advance towards the provision of service and in the nature of loan facility. The ‘mobilization advance’ is adjusted against the final payment due and is not linked to the work but as a pledge of the contract between the appellant and principal. It is also subject to furnishing of prescribed ‘bank guarantee’; there is no connection with the performance of the contract. It is not in dispute that the ‘mobilization advance�

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.