Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Moneygram India P. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax No. 89141 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/01/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Moneygram India P. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (CESTAT Mumbai)

Issue under consideration is that whether the Appellants are entitled to avail CENVAT Credit on the input service viz. event management service?

The learned Advocate for the Appellant submits that events are organized by the Appellant company for promoting their brand value and thus having direct nexus with the output service provided by the Appellant. 

CESTAT find that a similar issue has been considered by the Division Bench of this Tribunal in Honda Motorcycle & Scooter (I) Pvt. Ltd’s case. It is not in dispute that event management service has been used by the Appellant for promoting their brand value as recorded by both the authorities below in the respective orders. Thus, following the aforesaid judgment, CESTAT do not find merit in the impugned order.

Consequently, the same are set aside and the appeals are allowed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031