Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Saurashtra Cement Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 3702 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Where the damages paid to the assessee was directly and intimately linked with the procurement of a capital asset, compensation paid for the delay in procurement of capital asset amounted to sterilisation of the capital asset of the assessee as supplier had failed to supply the plant within time as stipulated in the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Akshay Sharma says:

    I have a doubt with regard to income tax given as below:-

    What would be the income tax treatment of liquidated damages pertaining to delayed supply machinery

    If we consider liquidated damages as capital receipts (CIT vs Saurashtra Cement) then do we need to reduce from actual cost of assets.

    I shall be greatful if you can provide any case law in this regard

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031