Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Premlata Purshottam Paldiwal Vs CIT, (Bombay High Court- Nagpur Bench)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 17 Of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/08/2017
Related Assessment Year :  1998­-1999, 1999­-2000, 2000­-2001, & 2001­-2002
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bombay High Court held that Interest on interim compensation received pending final disposal by the High Court is income if there is no direction given by the Court.  The source of funds to earn income cannot determine the taxability of the income earned on the capital amount which has been invested. This in the absence of any statutory mandate otherwise. The income earned would be chargeable to tax irrespective of the source of the funds from which the income has been earned. In the mercantile system of accounting, income accrues when the right to receive the same  arises, even though the actual receipt could be at a later date. In the present case it is an accepted position that the right to receive the interest from the fixed deposits already accrued to the appellant assessee.

In such circumstances, the interest on the fixed deposit would be chargeable to tax, as sought to be done by the Assessing Officer under the head income from other sources.

Full Text of the High Court Judgment / Order is as follows:-


JUDGMENT (Per M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031