This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 68 addition unjustified when Assessee submit confirmation & bank statement of Creditor
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Aarya Organic Foods & Ayurvedic Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Aarya Organic Foods & Ayurvedic Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
As far as addition of Rs.5 lakh of amount received from Sh. Jasbir Singh is concerned, we find that CIT(A) has given a finding that his confirmation, bank statement evidencing bank transfer is on record but since he had not given source of the money, the conditions stipulated u/s 68 have not been complied. We do not agree with the reasoning of CIT(A). When the fact of confirmation, bank transfer and bank statement of the lender of the money has not been found to be incorrect, it cannot be concluded ...
