Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Laxmi Narayan Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Rajasthan High Court)
Appeal Number : D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 20/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/12/2017
Related Assessment Year :

Shri Laxmi Narayan Vs CIT (Rajasthan High Court)

On the ground of investment made by the assessee in the name of his wife, in view of the decision of Delhi High Court in Sunbeam Auto Ltd. and other judgments of different High Courts,the word used is assessee has to invest it is not specified that it is to be in the name of assessee.

It is true that the contentions which have been raised by the department is that the investment is made by the assessee in his own name but the legislature while using language has not used specific language with precision and the second reason is that view has also been taken by the Delhi High Court that it can be in the name of wife. In that view of the matter, the contention raised by the assessee is required to be accepted with regard to Section 54B regarding investment in tubewell and others. In our considered opinion, for the purpose of carrying on the agricultural activity, tubewell and other expenses are for betterment of land and therefore, it will be considered a part of investment in the land and same is required to be accepted.

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (28535)
Type : Judiciary (12836)
Tags : high court judgments (4776) Section 54B (10)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *