Case Law Details
Income Tax Department filed an appeal u/s 260A in 2006 where the tax effect was less than Rs. 10 lakhs. High Court, relying on Instruction No. 3/2011 Dated 9-2-2011 dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. Income Tax Department challenged the decision on the ground that para 11 of Instruction No. 3/2011 Dated 9-2-2011 made it clear that it would apply only to appeals filed on or after 9.2.2011 and not to appeals filed earlier.
On Appeal Supreme Court held as under:
The tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs. 10 lakhs. As per the new guidelines of the CBDT, in those cases where the tax effect is less than Rs. 10 lakhs, appeal is not to be filed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)……….. /2012
(CC 21705/2011)
(From the judgement and order dated 21/04/2011 in ITA No. 1468/2006 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI)
C.I.T., DELHI
VERSUS
M/S VIRGO MARKETING PVT. LTD.
(With appln(s) for delay in filing SLP and office report)
Date: 06/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HONORABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK
HONORABLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR
Delay condoned.
In view of Para 11 of CBDT Instruction No.3/2011 dated 9th February, 2011, liberty is granted to the Department to move the High Court by way of review within four weeks.
—————————————————————
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
21.04.2011
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs.
M/S VIRGO MARKETING P.LTD.
ITA No.1468/2006
The tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs. 10 lakhs. As per the new guidelines of the CBDT, in those cases where the tax effect is less than Rs. 10 lakhs, appeal is not to be filed
The present appeal is dismissed on this ground alone.
A.K. SIKRI, J.
M.L. MEHTA, J.
APRIL 21, 2011