Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs. Oryx Finance and Investment (P) Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 01 of 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/07/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CIT Vs. Oryx Finance and Investment (P) Ltd. (Bombay High Court)

On reading the provisions of section 221 conjointly with the definition of “tax” as detailed under section 2(43), the irresistible conclusion that can be drawn is that the phraseology “tax in arrears” as envisaged in section 221 of the Act would not take within its realm the interest component. It would be abundantly clear that the assessing officer can impose penalty for default in making the payment of tax, but the same shall not exceed the amount of tax in arrears. Tax in arrears would not include the interest payable under section 220(2) of the Act.

Full Text of the High Court Judgment / Order is as follows:-

Admit. Taken up for final hearing with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031