Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10, 2011-12 & 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah Merely the claim of deduction did not find favour of the AO would not justify imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c): Aristo Pharma case Recently, in Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT [ITA No.6680/Mum/2012 with ITA No.5553/Mum/2014 and ITA No.5479/Mum/2015, A.Y.: 2009-10, 2011-12 & 2012-13, decided on 26.07.2018], briefly stated, the assessee-company was engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of pharmaceuticals products filed its return of income for A.Y. 2005-06 on 31.10.2005, declaring income at Rs. 81,16,05,080/-. The case of the a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930