Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITOr Vs M/s Umatech (ITAT Lucknow)
Appeal Number : ITA No.614/LKW/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/05/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Income Tax Officer Vs M/s Umatech (ITAT Lucknow)

We find that necessary TDS has been deducted by the assessee with regard to the labour charges paid and the required documents are also on record which essentially means that there has been no loss to the Revenue. The TDS was deducted and deposited in the Government Treasury and in the challan, in which amount was deposited, instead of TAN it was mentioned PAN. The Assessing Officer should have looked into the entirety of the proceedings being a quasi judicial authority whether there is any loss to the Revenue or whether there is any fault on the part of the assessee so as to not following the required procedure laid down by the law. Here we find, as appearing on record, especially in the order of the ld. CIT(A) that necessary TDS was deducted and it was deposited in the Government Treasury. All these are on record and only there is a technical error that in the challan PAN number of the assessee is mentioned instead of TAN in the relevant column on account of bona-fide mistake, for which assessee should not be penalized or punished when there is no loss to the Revenue.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT

This appeal preferred by the Revenue emanates from the order of the ld. CIT(A)-1, Lucknow dated 26/7/2016 on the following grounds of appeal:-

1. The CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,08,42,101/- which was made u/s 40a(ia) of the I.T. Act, 1961 without appreciating the fact that the assessee was claiming that he had deducted tax of Rs.4,29,646/- on 31.03.2009 on total labour payment of Rs.2,08,42,1017-, but surprisingly this amount of Rs.4,29,646/- was not appearing in the 26Q return filed by the assessee for last quarter. Thus, the assessee’s claim that he had deposited amount of Rs.4,29,646/- on 29.09.2009 is not correct as according to TDS return for quarter IV, only tax of Rs.1,87,793/- was deducted in the last quarter.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031