This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT allows Vacancy Allowance since Assessee couldn’t find Tenant
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shri Sachin R. Tendulkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah
Shri Sachin R. Tendulkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai): The assessee had been unable to let out the property for the captioned period, he was entitled to deduction under section 23(1)(c) for vacancy allowance
In Sachin R. Tendulkar vs. DCIT [I.T.A. No. 3755/Mum/2016 (A.Y.: 2012-13), decided on 10.08.2018], the ground raised was that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-34, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as the CIT (A)] erred in arriving at the deemed rental income in respect of the vacant flat situated at Sapphire Park, Balewadi, Pune @ Rs.15,000 pe...
