Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : R.P. Sarathy for Minor Pranuthi Vs JCIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 1995-1996 to 1999-2000
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
R.P. Sarathy for Minor Pranuthi Vs JCIT (Madras High Court) Conclusion – If parents are not available, Section 160 (1) (ii) of the Act will stand attracted and the Guardian will become the Legal Representative, liable to discharge all the tax obligations under the Act on behalf of the minor. Facts – Assessee, a minor, inherited property of her parents and grandmother and derived income from the same. AO assessed taxable income in the hands of Minor holding that section 64(1A) couldn’t be applied since both the parents of the minor have expired. However, Tribunal held that income of minor...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. kkaushik says:

    A minor get interest income from the Investment. Such investment was made from the Money received from the Mediclaim amount received due to accidental death of his father. Such interest income needs to club with the income of Guardian who is taking care and has invested such money in the name of minor?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930