Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT Vs Aimil Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Sponsored
It was held that if the employees contribution is not deposited by the due date prescribed under the relevant Act and is deposited late, the employer not only pays interest on such delayed payment but could incur penalties also. Those Acts permit the employer to make deposit with some delays. Therefore, these amounts could not be disallowed under section 43B if the payment is made before the due date prescribed for filing the return. Precedent could be found in CIT Vs. Vinay Cement Ltd (2007) 213 CTR (SC) 268.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.