Attachment of bank A/cs U/s. 226(3) not justified as dept already recovered more than 15% of disputed demand

Sesa Resources Ltd. Vs. Asst. CIT & Ors. (Bombay High Court At Goa Bench)

We have heard the submissions of the learned counsel and we have also gone through the records. For the reasons stated in the said judgment of this Court in the case of Andrew Communications India (P) Ltd. (supra) and as it is not in dispute that the facts therein are identical to the facts in the present case, we have no reason to take a contrary view in the present petition. Admittedly, 15 per cent of the disputed amount

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.