Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gillette Diversified Operations Private Limited Vs Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals-II) (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Gillette Diversified Operations Private Limited Vs Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals-II) (Madras High Court)

Madras High Court held refund claim filed within two years from ‘relevant date’ as defined in Explanation 2(a) to Section 54(14) of CGST Act. Therefore order rejecting refund claim not sustainable.

Facts- In W.P.No.6531 of 2022, the petitioner seeks for a Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to extend the benefit of proviso introduced under Rule 90(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 to exclude the n

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930