Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharath FIH Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bharath FIH Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai held that ‘Receiver’ being part of the phone is classifiable under CTH 8517. Thus, classification sought to be made by the Revenue under CTH 8518 lacks merit and hence, order is set aside.

Facts- The assesse-importer imported certain items vide various Bills of Entry declared as “Receiver” by classifying them under CTH 85177090, paid the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) at 5% thereby claiming the benefit under Notification No.50/2017-Cus. dt. 30.06.2017, for the peri

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930