Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharath FIH Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bharath FIH Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that ‘Receiver’ being part of the phone is classifiable under CTH 8517. Thus, classification sought to be made by the Revenue under CTH 8518 lacks merit and hence, order is set aside. Facts- The assesse-importer imported certain items vide various Bills of Entry declared as “Receiver” by classifying them under CTH 85177090, paid the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) at 5% thereby claiming the benefit under Notification No.50/2017-Cus. dt. 30.06.2017, for the period 04.07.2017 to 30.01.2018. Entertaining a doubt tha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930