Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ms. Pallavi Gulati and Sh. Abhimanyu Gulati Vs M/s Puri Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
Appeal Number : Case No. 30/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/05/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ms. Pallavi Gulati and Sh. Abhimanyu Gulati Vs M/s Puri Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

The issue that needs to be dwelled upon is as to whether there was a case of not passing on of the benefit of ITC and whether the provisions of Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 are attracted in the present case. Perusal of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 shows that it provides as under:-

“Any reduction in rate of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of input tax credit shall be passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices.”

It is established from the perusal of the above facts of the case that the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have been contravened by the Respondent as he has profiteered an amount of Rs. 1,01,06,773/- inclusive of GST @ 12% or 18% on the base profiteered amount of Rs. 89,68,979/-. The Respondent has also realized an additional amount to the tune of Rs. 49,169/- from the Applicant No. 1 which includes both the profiteered amount @1.79% of the taxable amount (base price) and GST on the said profiteered amount. The Respondent has also realized an additional amount of Rs. 15,90,239/- which includes both the profiteered amount @1.79% of the taxable amount (base price) and GST on the said profiteered amount from 92 other flat buyers who were not Applicants in the present proceedings as per Annexure-24 of the Report. These buyers are identifiable as per the documents placed on record and therefore, the Respondent is directed to pass on this amount of Rs. 15,90,239/-along with interest @18% per annum to these 92 flat buyers from the dates from which the above amount was collected by him from the buyers till the payment is made.

In view of the above facts this Authority under Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules, 2017 orders that the Respondent shall reduce the prices to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him as has been detailed above. Since the present investigation is only up to 30.06.2018 any benefit of ITC which accrues subsequently shall also be passed on to the buyers by the Respondent. The Annexures submitted by the Respondent through his submissions dated 11.10.2018 and 05.11.2018 which comprise of the details of suo moto payments made by him through various modes are taken on record.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031