Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saini Engineering And Civil Contractor Vs State of Up And 2 Others (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Tax No. 723 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/05/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Saini Engineering And Civil Contractor Vs State of Up And 2 Others (Allahabad High Court)

The case of Saini Engineering And Civil Contractor vs. State of UP And 2 Others, heard in the Allahabad High Court, revolved around a writ petition challenging the cancellation of registration under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (the Act). The petitioner contested two orders: one for the cancellation of registration dated January 20, 2023, issued by the Assistant Commissioner, and another dated June 15, 2023, issued by the Additional Commissioner (Appeal) GST Office, Bijnor.

The petitioner argued that the cancellation of registration was done without proper application of mind, citing discrepancies in the order’s language and lack of reasoning. The court referred to a Division Bench judgment in Surendra Bahadur Singh v. State of U.P., which emphasized the importance of reasoned orders in administrative and quasi-judicial proceedings. The court highlighted that under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution, the right to run a business is protected, and any adverse action affecting this right must be accompanied by proper reasoning as per Article 14.

The court also referred to the case of Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks, Mumbai and Ors., where the Supreme Court emphasized the necessity of reasons in administrative or quasi-judicial orders. Additionally, the judgment of Om Prakash Mishra v. State of U.P. & Ors. was cited, emphasizing that reasons are the “heart and soul” of any judicial or administrative order.

The court found that the impugned order lacked reasoning and therefore did not satisfy the requirements of Article 14 of the Constitution. Accordingly, the court set aside both the original order of cancellation and the appellate order. The petitioner was directed to file a reply to the show cause notice within three weeks, and the adjudicating authority was instructed to proceed de novo, granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

advocate in Allahabad High Court, only dealing in GST litigation. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

HC direct issue of user ID & password to enable unregistered dealer to file GST appeal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031