This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
GST on drawings by sub-consultants: AAR allows Application withdrawal
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- In re Studio 30 Architects & Planners (GST AAR Karnataka)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- AAR Karnataka, Advance Rulings
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
In re Studio 30 Architects & Planners (GST AAR Karnataka)
In the case of M/s. Studio 30 Architects & Planners (GST AAR Karnataka), the applicant, a partnership firm providing architect services, sought an advance ruling under Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017. The specific question was whether the provisions of Section 12(3) of the IGST Act, 2017 are applicable to a sub-consultant, given that the sub-consultants provide drawings to the applicant, which are then incorporated into the final drawings given to the customer without any direct interaction between the sub-co...
