Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Studio 30 Architects & Planners (GST AAR Karnataka)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Studio 30 Architects & Planners (GST AAR Karnataka)

In the case of M/s. Studio 30 Architects & Planners (GST AAR Karnataka), the applicant, a partnership firm providing architect services, sought an advance ruling under Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017. The specific question was whether the provisions of Section 12(3) of the IGST Act, 2017 are applicable to a sub-consultant, given that the sub-consultants provide drawings to the applicant, which are then incorporated into the final drawings given to the customer without any direct interaction betwee

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31