Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : TDK India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 76541 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/11/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

TDK India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)

Regarding Works Contract Service, it has been observed in the impugned order that w.e.f 01.07.2012, vide Notification No. 30/2012-ST, the reverse charge mechanism for Works Contract Service was introduced. I find that this Notification is applicable to individual/partnership firm and Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). It is not applicable to corporate assessee. The Appellant herein is a Private Limited Company and the services are supplied by Private Limited Company. Accordingly, this Notification is not applicable to the present case. Further, the Ld.Commissioner (Appeals) has also referred to Notification No.26/2012-ST dated 01.07.2012 for valuation of service and abatement. This Notification is also not applicable to the facts of the present case. Therefore, the credit disallowed under the “Works Contract Service” cannot be sustained and the same is set aside.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT KOLKATA ORDER

The Appellant is engaged in the manufacture of soft ferrite parts/components falling under Tariff Heading No.85051110 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Show-cause notice dated was issued to the Appellant alleging wrong availment and utilization of cenvat credit on Air Travel Agency Service, Works Contract Service and Construction Service etc. The Adjudicating Authority has confirmed the demand as proposed in the Show-cause notice and appropriated a sum of Rs.35,536/-, which was paid/reversed by the Appellant. An amount of Rs.6090/- was also paid towards the interest liability. On appeal, the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal before him and upheld the adjudication order. Hence, the present appeal before the Tribunal.

2. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031