This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Classification of Service cannot be disputed at the recipient End
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
CESTAT find that the cenvat credit was denied to appellant on the ground that service being classifiable under Sponsorship Service, the appellant was supposed to discharge the service tax under GR-7 Challan. We find that the service provider M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Pvt. Ltd. has classified the service under Business Auxiliary Service, in such case it is the service provider who is suppose to pay the service tax and the appellant can take the cenvat credit only on the basis of invoice issued by the service provider. The entire b...
