Classification of Service cannot be disputed at the recipient End

Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT find that the cenvat credit was denied to appellant on the ground that service being classifiable under Sponsorship Service, the appellant was supposed to discharge the service tax under GR-7 Challan. We find that the service provider M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Pvt. Ltd. has classified the service under Business Auxiliary Service, in such case it is the service provider who is suppose to pay the service tax and the appellant can take the cenvat credit onl

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.