Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 51093 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/09/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Customs (Air) Vs Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi)

Conclusion: Imported WAP was entitled to an exemption from the whole of the customs duties under the ITA as it worked on technology and did not support the LTE standard.

Held: Respondent was a distributor of information technology products. It imported WAP from various suppliers for trading purposes in India, and it classified the imported WAP under CTI 8517 62 90 during the period from 11.07.2014 to 30.06.2017. The department contended that TRAI, in its recommendations on Telecom Equipment Manufacturing Policy dated 12.04.2011, had regarded Wi-Fi WAP as a broad band equipment under the category of telecom equipment. The notification dated October 5, 2012, issued by the Department of Telecommunications, following the policy of preferential treatment to indigenous manufacturers in government purchases, had categorised WAP as’ Wi-Fi based broadband wireless access systems’. The amendment made by the notification had taken out specified telecom products for increasing the BCD to 10%, and this included Wi-Fi based WAP. It was held that the Finance Minister’s Budget Speech for the year 2014-15 and Tax Research Unit letter dated 10.07.2014 clarified that BCD on specified telecommunication products not covered under the ITA was being increased from NIL to 10%. As WAP was an Information Technology product and was specifically covered under the ITA as ‘Network Equipment’ in Attachment B, the intention was clearly not to exclude WAP imported by Ingram Micro. The Network Equipment as defined in Annexure-B included LAN and Wide Area Network apparatus, including those products dedicated for use solely or principally to permit the interconnection of automatic data processing machines and units thereof for a network that was used primarily for the sharing of resources such as central processor units, data storage devices and input or output units – including adapters, hubs, in-line repeaters, converters, concentrators, bridges and routers, and printed circuit assemblies for physical incorporation into automatic data processing machines and units thereof. Imported WAP was a networking equipment working in LAN connecting Wi-fi enabled devices such as laptops, smartphones, tablets, etc. to a wired network. Thus also, imported WAP was entitled to the exemption from the whole of the customs duties under the ITA.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT DELHI ORDER

The Commissioner of Customs (Air) Chennai-VII Comminssionerate 1 has filed this appeal to assail the order dated 23.12.2019 passed by the Additional Director General (Adjudication), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, New Delhi2, holding that Wireless Access Points3 imported by M/s. Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd4 would be classifiable under Customs Tariff Item5 8517 62 90 and accordingly would be entitled to exemption from Basic Customs Duty6 under the notification dated 01.03.2005, as amended by the notification dated 11.07.2014. The demand of customs duty for the period from 11.07.2014 to 30.06.2017 has, therefore, been dropped. The penalty imposed upon Ingram Micro as also its Director Material, Blase D’Souza have also been dropped.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031