Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Royal Cushion Vinyl Products Limited Vs Commissioner Of Customs Export (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Application Dairy No-86257/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/08/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Royal Cushion Vinyl Products Limited Vs Commissioner Of Customs Export (CESTAT Mumbai)

On perusal of the date chart/list of events, as above, we find that as a sick company, the applicant was pursuing the matter before the BIFR under the Sick Industrial Companies (special Provisions) Act, 1985. Further, on examination of the case records, we find that there is no negligence on the part of the appellant in not filing of appeal within stipulated time frame provided under the statute. In so far as the issue of condonation of delay is concerned, the Tribunal is not only required to look at the period of delay but is also required to examine the qualitatively, as to whether the reasons set out for seeking the condonation of delay are genuine and bona fide. We find that in the similar set of facts, the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Pentafour Products Ltd. Vs. CCE — 2013 (290) ELT A154 (Mad) has allowed the COD application considering the fact that the appellant company therein was a sick company and operating under the management of the Court Receiver.

In the case of Balakrishnan Vs. M. Krishnamurthy – 2008 (228) ELT 162 (SC), the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that length of delay is no matter, acceptability of the explanation is the only criterion. It has also been held that sometimes, delay of the shortest range may be uncondonable due to want of acceptable explanation; whereas in certain other cases, delay of a very long range can be condoned as the explanation thereof is satisfactory.

On going through the case records, we are convinced that the delay occurred in filing the appeal is genuine and satisfactory explanation was furnished by the applicant in support of condonation of the same. Therefore, the present miscellaneous application filed by the applicant is considered and accordingly, the delay caused in filing the appeal before the Tribunal is condoned.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT MUMBAI ORDER

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031