Whether improper hair cut & consequent humiliation/embarrassment is deficiency in service for compensation under Consumer Protection Laws
SC held that extension of period up to which delay can be condoned is not the same as the extension of limitation period ( Sagufa Ahmed & Ors. v. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors)
Though this issue is no longer res integra in view of catena of judicial decisions of the highest court of the Country, the Hon’ble Supreme Court once again considered this matter when the Punjab & Haryana High court relegated the assessee to alternative remedy in a challenge made to jurisdiction of the revisional authority to reopen proceedings u/s 34 of the VAT Act.
Union Bank of India Vs Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Supreme Court of India) The Supreme Court upheld Rajasthan High Court judgment and held that RERA would not apply in relation to the transaction between the borrower and the banks and financial institutions in cases where security interest has been created by mortgaging the property […]
K.L. Suneja Vs Dr. (Mrs.) Manjeet Kaur Monga (D) (Supreme Court of India) An interesting question arose in this case where an apartment buyer was returned the money paid by her by way of a Pay-order by the developer instead of giving the flat. This was disputed by the flat allottee as she was willing […]
Supreme Court ruling: Disputes affecting only a fraction of a project should not halt the entire venture. Explore the legal perspective on Developer Group India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Surinder Singh Marwah. Learn about the principles guiding court orders in such matters.
SC set aside the condition imposed by Chhattisgarh HC, of depositing INR 70 Lakh for grant of bail in a matter of wrongful availment of ITC
Supreme Court held that insertion of sub-section (6) to section 1 is effective from 20.10.1989. Hence, on and after 20.10.1989, irrespective of number of persons employed a factory or an establishment shall be governed by the ESI Act.
It is held that HC has erred in entertaining the writ petition against the SCN and quashing of notice is pre-mature and the merits of the case have to be considered by the original authority in an appropriate proceeding.
SC held that the activity of digital offset and offset printing amounts to manufacture and same is classifiable under heading chapter 4911 of Central Excise Tariff.
