Held that an application u/s. 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator, filed beyond three years, is barred by limitation.
Rakesh Jain Vs Central Bureau of Investigation (Punjab & Haryana High Court) There is a merit in the arguments raised by learned counsel for the respondent-CBI that Investigating Officer, who conducted the investigation in part, has collected various documents from the financial institutions like Banks, Income Tax Department, schools or insurance companies etc., which have […]
Held that the power to grant bail is not to be deployed as a mechanism for imposing sentence even before a guilt is yet to be proved and established.
Midland Microfin Ltd. Vs Union of India and others (Punjab and Haryana High Court) Whether at this stage of notice under Section 148, writ Court should venture into the merits of the controversy when AO is yet to frame assessment/reassemment in discharge of statutory duty casted upon him under Section 147 of the Act Admittedly […]
Gourav Bansal Vs State of Haryana (Punjab & Haryana High Court) This common order shall dispose of above noted two petitions as they arise out of the same FIR. Prayer in these petitions, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is for grant of regular bail to petitioners Gourav Bansal and Surender […]
Respondent cannot be presumed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of Court and waived its right to arbitration when it had reserved its right to take appropriate legal proceedings against plaintiff.
The process of law cannot be taken recourse to circumvent the due procedure prescribed in law. There is further no reason why the petitioner cannot take recourse to institution of appropriate proceedings before the competent authorities in accordance with law.
Gulam Deen Vs State of Punjab (Punjab & Haryana High Court) This Court has taken note of the judgements cited on behalf of the petitioners and also the fact that the girl in the instant case i.e. petitioner No.2 is aged more than 16 years. In the case of Yunus Khan vs. State of Haryana […]
Punjab and Haryana High Court affirms ITAT’s decision on Anil Kumar’s appeal, upholding the assessment. Court rejects challenge on grounds of different treatment for 2014-15.
Parveen Mehta Vs Vishal Joshi (Punjab & Haryana High Court) HC held that undisputed signatures of the respondent on the cheque in itself is not sufficient for conviction under Section 138 of the Act. One of the ingredient for succeeding under Section 138 of the Act is that the cheque was issued for discharge of […]
