Sponsored
    Follow Us:

ITAT Pune

Profits on sale of land held as Investment for 6 years assessable as Capital Gains

October 10, 2021 1917 Views 0 comment Print

JCIT (OSD) Vs Adrus Estate and Properties LLP (ITAT Pune) It is an undisputed fact that the land was recorded in the books of account as part of investment. It is settled position that the treatment given in the books of account gives an indication as to the intention of the assessee to hold asset […]

No disallowance under rule 8D(2)(ii) RW section 14A if interest free funds exceeds investment

October 5, 2021 2346 Views 0 comment Print

When the funds available to the assessee both interest free and interest bearing loans, there shall be a presumption that the investments made would be out of the interest free funds available with the assessee, provided the interest free funds were sufficient to meet the investments which means that when the interest free funds are available to the assessee which were sufficient to meet its investments should be presumed that investments were made out of such interest free funds.

Payment for mere right to use copyrighted software cannot be treated as Royalty

September 26, 2021 1155 Views 0 comment Print

Trigo SAS Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) Assessee has merely transferred the right to use copyrighted software ANTIFOG and that it had not transferred the copyright itself to Trigo India. TRIGO India was authorized to have access to and make use of the copyrighted software ANTIFOG. In the Software License Agreement entered into, it is evident […]

Comparable having extraordinary financial event of M&A cannot be considered for TP analysis

September 25, 2021 1110 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT held that in case A comparable having an extraordinary financial event of Merger and Acquisition (M& A) during the year the same cannot be considered as functionally comparable for transfer pricing (TP) comparability analysis.

No requirement of approval by DSIR authority in form No. 3CL prior to 01.07.2016

September 14, 2021 7386 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Force Motors Limited (ITAT Pune) The sole grievance of the Revenue in this appeal is with regard to deletion of the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer on account of excess deduction claimed by the assessee over and above the amount approved by the DSIR by holding that before Tenth Amendment Rule, 2010, […]

Protection & furtherance of interests of trade & commerce is charitable purpose u/s. 2(15)

September 12, 2021 927 Views 0 comment Print

In this case CIT(E),held that the trust was a Members’ association and all the activities were limited to its members and not to general public at large so as to fall within the clause “advancement of any other object of general public utility”. He, therefore, refused the registration against which the assessee has come up in appeal before the Tribunal.

Expense on development of Tools & Designs cannot be termed as revenue expense

September 12, 2021 543 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Sutham Electric Ltd. (ITAT Pune) The solitary issue in the present case relates to the allowability of the expenditure incurred on development of Tools and Designs which are used in the business and manufacturing of automotive switch gears of Rs.3,75,00,000/- as revenue expenditure. This expenditure was shown as deferred revenue expenditure written off […]

ITAT Pune deletes addition for share capital & share premium

September 9, 2021 984 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Mahalaxmi TMT Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune) AO found that the assessee company was established dated 10 August 2004 i.e. during the financial year 2004-05 corresponding to the assessment year 2005-06 and it did not carry out any business activity till the year under consideration. Conversely, it has issued shares at a premium of […]

No section 40(a)(i) disallowance for commission paid to overseas agents

July 15, 2021 1743 Views 0 comment Print

Carraro India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)  It is seen that the assessee paid commission of Rs.58.65 lakh to overseas agents for export orders obtained by them in overseas territories. Section 195 mandates the deduction of tax at source from any sum paid by the assessee which is ‘chargeable under the provisions of this […]

Section 56(2)(v) relative definition not apply for Specified Domestic Transactions

July 14, 2021 3711 Views 0 comment Print

Smt. Anita Sunil Mahajan Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Definition of ‘relative’ for Specified Domestic Transactions (SDTs) should be as per Section 2(41) of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Section 56(2)(v) would not apply. Case Summary: – Facts of the case: During AY 2013-14, Smt. Anita Sunil Mahajan (Assessee), filed her return declaring total income at […]

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031