Balwant Baburao Vitekar (Late) vs ITO (ITAT Pune) where the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) was challenged. The appeal was allowed on the grounds that the assessee was not given the opportunity to assist in the penalty proceedings.
Explore ITAT Pune’s decision in Americhem Polymers vs ACIT. Key issue: Weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) disallowance for non-submission of DSIR report.
ITAT Pune held that change in method of accounting cannot partake character of concealment. Accordingly, penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not leviable.
ITAT Pune held that registration under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act not granted as the agreement gives benefit of the persons covered u/s. 13(3) of the Act.
ITAT held that Co-Operative Societies can claim Interest Received from Co-Op. Banks as Deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I. T. Act, 1961
ITAT Pune held that first and second proviso(es) to section 50C(1), inserted by the Finance Act 2016 w.e.f. 01.04.2017 being curative in nature inserted for removing hardships to the taxpayers and, therefore, it carries retrospective effect.
Explore the landmark ruling by ITAT Pune on deductions for interest income from deposits with a nationalized bank, as illustrated in the Subordinate Engineers Association MSEB Co.op. Credit Society Ltd Vs ITO case.
ITAT Pune held that difference between average price of sugar sold in the market and that sold to members at concessional rate is appropriation of profit or not needs re-consideration. Accordingly, matter restored.
ITAT Pune held that penalty under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act leviable as assessee failed to substantiate the source as well as the manner of the undisclosed income.
ITAT Pune held that late fees u/s 234E of the Income Tax Act can be levied only prospectively with effect from 01.06.2015.
