ITAT Pune held that mere non-furnishing of declaration to the bank in terms of proviso to rule 37BA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, the amount of tax deducted at source on interest on bank deposit cannot be disallowed while clubbing of the income.
ITAT Pune held that as assessee does not satisfy the condition of advancement of any other object of general public utility, its eligibility for benefit of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act is doubtful.
ITAT Pune held that amount refunded back to the employer on account of breach of non-compete agreement by the employee cannot be construed as salary for the purpose of charging income tax.
ITAT Pune held that as on the date of agreement, the building was not constructed, the date of possession will be considered as actual date of purchase for the purpose of claiming exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Pune held that interest paid on customs duty is allowable as deduction under section 43B of the Income Tax Act 1961.
Ajay Engineering and Agricultural Equipment Company Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that AO did not specifically discuss the five issues in the assessment order, however, assessment order does not satisfy the second condition of being prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Simply non-discussion of an issue in assessment order does not render […]
ITAT Pune held that expenditure incurred on repairs and renovation of the asset is revenue expenditure as no new asset has been created.
ITAT Pune held that non-compliance with communication under Section 143(1)(A) of Income Tax Act 1961 due to IT-Website technical glitches was unintentional and beyond the control of appellant. Accordingly, exemption in the evince of Form No 10B duly available.
Lions Nab Community Eyecare Centre Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) Appellant filed the return of income in Form No.5. However, no documents were filed along with the return of income justifying the claim for exemption u/s 11 of the Act. It is only after receipt of intimation, the appellant took a plea that its income was […]
Galaxy Construction and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present appeal relates to levy of penalty under the provisions of section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The penalty was levied by the Assessing Officer in respect of addition made under the provisions of section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. It is an […]
