ITAT Pune held that subsidy received by the assessee is towards the investment made in the expansion of its industrial unit under the Package Incentive Scheme 2001 is ‘Capital’ receipts. Accordingly, the same is not taxable.
ITAT Pune favors Shashi Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd. in tax adjustment case against refunds. Delve into the case details and the tribunal’s decision.
ITAT Pune rules on Sushil Industries’ case, asserting that overlooking the sale of scrap is erroneous and jeopardizes revenue. A significant verdict for businesses.
ITAT Pune orders re-adjudication, emphasizing the importance of natural justice and giving Sachin Vasant Jare a chance to present his submissions.
ITAT Pune held that penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act duly leviable in absence of any plausible legal explanation with regard to misreporting of taxable income and increasing deductions.
ITAT held that approach adopted by NFAC merely because he granted relief in respect of one item of additions, does not mean that he can deny justice in respect of balance additions/grounds of appeal raised before him.
A detailed analysis of the ITAT Pune judgement on Dinesh Patel vs ITO involving client code modification and tax assessment.
The ITAT Pune declares the assessment order invalid in the case of Prabhakar Amruta Shillak Vs ITO for AY 2012-13. The order violated CBDT circular and was treated as never issued.
ITAT Pune held that interest income earned by the cooperative society from the investment with cooperative banks qualifies for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT has held in the case of Meera Anirudha Mirgunde Vs ITO that when there is no variation in the returned and assessable income, penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is not leviable.
