In the case of Piramal Enterprises Ltd vs DCIT, ITAT Mumbai directed deletion of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) addition on business promotion expenses due to absence of an employer-employee relationship.
Even if income of Non-resident on which tax is deducted, is not taxable in India, credit is to be given for TDS on such income and excess TDS is to refunded to taxpayer.
Explore the detailed analysis of Mack Star Marketing Private Limited Vs National Faceless Appeal Centre Delhi regarding taxing unsold flats in real estate business, applicable from AY 2018-19. ITAT deletes notional rent addition for AY 2014-15.
In a case of transfer expenses, Mumbai ITAT directs to allow stamp duty & registration charges. Detailed analysis of the case provided here.
Explore the case of Mahapalika Kshetra Madhyamik Shikshak Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit vs CIT(A) (ITAT Mumbai) regarding deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Despite legal contention that addition under section 69 was erroneous, ITAT emphasized necessity of substantiating genuineness of transactions, rather than merely disputing section under which additions were made.
In the case of Krishnamurthy Thiagarajan vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai), AO’s failure to record dissatisfaction u/s 14A led to ITAT allowing expenditure claim under Section 14A related to earning exempt income.
ITAT Mumbai grants relief to Tata Steel Limited, allowing deduction of interest paid on Perpetual Non-Convertible Debentures (PNCD) under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act.
Detailed analysis of Chandarani N. Goyal Vs ITO case where Mumbai ITAT ruled that money received as a security deposit, if refunded, is not taxable under section 56(2)(vii)(a) of the Income Tax Act.
In Chandresh P. Thakker vs National Faceless Assessment Centre case, Mumbai ITAT allows commission expenses if supported by evidence of services rendered by commission agents and income shown in return.
