Balaji Janakiraman Vs ACIT (OSD) (ITAT Chennai) In the case of Smt. NS. Lakshmi, the assessee had taken a sum of Rs.20 lakhs through bank, and out of Rs.20 lakhs, the AO has accepted a sum of Rs.6 lakhs as genuine, and the remaining amount of Rs.14 lakhs has been added as unexplained credit. The […]
ITAT Chennai held that as per the ratio of decision of jurisdictional High Court in CIT V/s Gumanmal it is held that deduction u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act is available in respect of more than one property
Trivitron Healthcare Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) The PCIT has questioned provision for warranty expenses amounting to Rs.2,25,71,530/-. According to the PCIT, there is a five times increase in provision for warranty expenses for the AY 2014-15 when compare to AY 2013-14. Although, the assessee has not explained rational behind substantial increase in expenses, […]
N.C. Rajagopal & Co. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee has claimed credit for TDS amounting to Rs. 45,59,855/-, whereas DCIT, CPC has allowed TDS credit for Rs. 33,35,055/-. We find that the assessee has claimed credit for TDS pertains to earlier financial years, because income relating to said TDS has been offered to tax […]
Umamaheswari Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) As regards, the first objection of the AO on legal tender of Specified Bank Notes on or after 08.11.2016, I find that as per the Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Ordinance, 2016, which came into effect from 31.12.2016 appointed date for this purpose means 31.12.2016. Further, as per Sec.5 […]
ITAT Chennai held that expenditure towards furniture maintenance which is incurred to make the lease premises workable and functional is revenue in nature.
ITAT Chennai held that UPS and Printers being part of a computer systems and hence eligible for higher depreciation at the rate 60%
ITAT Chennai held that test applied by AO that land was sold to a company which was not carrying agricultural operations is not justifiable for denying exemption to sale of agricultural land u/s 2(14) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT held that the interest paid on belated payments of service tax is allowable for deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
ITAT Chennai held that addition as unexplained investment for quantity of jewellery within the permissible limits as per CBDT instruction no. 1916 dated 11.05.1994 is unsustainable.
