AO was not justified in addition of interest expenses debited in the P&L account, a sum of Rs.2,12,94,836/- was capitalized towards CWIP under Section 36(1)(iii) of and added to the total income of the assessee.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that AO had no jurisdiction to initiate proceedings u/s. 153C of the Income Tax Act beyond permissible period of six years from date of receipt of books/ documents by AO.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the assessee has established that they were the sole developer in the contracts which are related to the developing, operating and maintaining the infrastructure facilities as envisaged u/s. 80IA(4)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Rahul G. Patel, granting exemption under Section 54EC for investments made in NHAI bonds before the sale deed registration.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unwarranted as the amount represents sales already declared and taxed. Thus, income already offered for taxation cannot be taxed again as unexplained cash credit.
The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on the disallowance of TDS credit to Theo Desh Consultants due to non-inclusion of corresponding income in the relevant assessment year.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Metro Heritage Pvt Ltd’s case back to CIT(A) due to COVID disruptions and a hotel fire, allowing a fresh opportunity for evidence presentation.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands the Vidhyanagar Jain Society’s registration case to CIT(E) for reconsideration due to non-submission of documents and unavoidable delays.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that merely making a claim that is not sustainable does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Accordingly, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not justified.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the AO must record a proper satisfaction regarding the incorrectness of the assessee’s claim before invoking Rule 8D u/s. 14A. Thus, in absence of such satisfaction, disallowance u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act unsustainable.
