The ld. counsel vehemently stated that the legislative intent in prohibiting the acceptance and repayment of money in cash over and above Rs. 20,000/- is to check the unaccounted money and not to hit the genuine business need.
DCIT Vs M/s. Real Strips Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) The addition was solely made on the basis of the statement furnished by the production manager of the assessee at the time of survey. The lower authorities have not brought any iota of evidence suggesting that the assessee has suppressed the production leading to suppressed sale out […]
Income Transferred from Capital Fund A/c to Income is eligible for deduction U/s. 11of Income Tax Act, 1961 and provisions of Section 11(3)(c) of the Act clearly permits to utilize the funds either within the specified period or in the next year immediately following the expiry of the period
This Revenue’s appeal and assessee’s cross objection for assessment year 2010-11 arise against the CIT(A), Gandhinagar’s order dated 22.05.2014, in case no. CIT(A)/GNR/2 12/2013-14, reversing Assessing Officer’s action making long term capital gains addition of Rs. 70,34,635/- by invoking Section 50C of the Act, in proceedings u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short the Act.
DCIT Vs M/s. Gujarat Microwax Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT held that the Commission income in the hands of foreign agent is not chargeable to tax in India in the given facts & circumstances and Once an income is not chargeable to tax in India then the question of deducting TDS under the provision of […]
Assessee’s contention for levy of interest for the second month could arise only if the period of time between the date on which tax was deducted and the date on which tax was paid to the Government exceeds one month, was justified. Thus, AO was directed to re-compute the levy of interest under section 201(1A) accordingly.
Applicant along with their staff were extremely pre-occupied with the GST work of transition and registration of the dealers. Since, it was a new enactment and there were enormous complexities and unclearity, apart from the technological problems, continuously issued circulars and instructions etc., the said tax consultant could not file adjournment application
These are four appeals by the assessee and revenue against each other against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XI & VIII, Ahmedabad, dated 25/11/2011 & 27/09/2012 for the Assessment Years (AYs) 2008-09 & 2009-10.
The assessee failed to demonstrate as to what services have been rendered by her husband or the daughter to whom salaries have been paid. Therefore, the salary claimed by the assessee towards husband and daughter deserves to be disallowed.
Maheshbhai Shantibhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The taxability of undisclosed income detected in the course of search in the case of partnership firm where the assessee is a partner is in question. We shall first take a look into the second proposition raised on behalf of the assessee. On behalf of the assessee, it […]
