ITAT Indore rules in Asha Rani Pandya Vs DCIT/ACIT that filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is a directory requirement, not mandatory.
Chemstar International Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) mere suspicion or cancellation of registration post-donation not invalidate initial eligibility for Section 35(1)(ii)deduction.
Read the detailed ITAT Raipur order on rejection of S.12AB application under Income Tax Act, directing re-adjudication by CIT(E). Full analysis provided.
ITAT Jaipur rules in Shobha Tomar Vs DCIT that cash deposits from professional income during demonetization cannot be deemed unexplained. Detailed analysis inside.
ITAT noted that CIT(A)’s decision was reasoned, considering discrepancies in repayment timelines and absence of proper documentation or corroborative evidence. It concluded that CIT(A)’s findings were based on facts and did not merely rely on suspicion.
Merely because certain cash was deposited in the specified bank notes by the assessee during the demonetization period will not make the assessee tainted party when the very same transaction are being made by the assessee in the part as well as in the future.
Detailed analysis of Dhoom Singh Sharma Vs ITO case where ITAT Delhi accepts agricultural income proof, overturning Rs.16.4 Lakhs addition. Read the full order.
Detailed analysis of the ITAT Kolkata ruling on Shringar Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT, highlighting key arguments, legal precedents, and the final judgment.
ITAT Indore dismisses revenue appeals in ITO Vs. M.P. Police Sakh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit due to low tax effect, citing CBDT Circular No. 5/2024 eliminating audit objections.
Explore the detailed ITAT Mumbai order analysis of Yogesh P. Thakkar vs DCIT, focusing on disputed long-term capital gains and commission expenditure.
