Abstract
Insolvency proceedings are a crucial aspect of modern financial systems, involving intricate legal, financial, and administrative processes. This abstract explores the pivotal role played by regulatory bodies and intermediaries in managing insolvency scenarios. Regulatory bodies, often government agencies, wield significant influence in shaping and overseeing insolvency frameworks, ensuring compliance with legal norms, and promoting economic stability. These entities contribute to the development and enforcement of insolvency laws, providing a structured framework for the resolution of financial distress.
Intermediaries, such as insolvency practitioners, financial advisors, and resolution professionals, emerge as key players within the insolvency landscape. They navigate the complex web of legal proceedings, facilitate communication between stakeholders, and work towards maximizing the value of distressed assets. Their role extends beyond the mere execution of insolvency procedures, encompassing the delicate balance of preserving enterprise value and safeguarding the interests of creditors.
This abstract examines the dynamic role of intermediaries in orchestrating negotiations, formulating resolution plans, and ensuring an equitable distribution of assets among creditors. The interplay between regulatory bodies and intermediaries is crucial for fostering a resilient insolvency ecosystem that facilitates economic recovery and preserves the integrity of financial markets. As financial systems continue to evolve, policymakers, practitioners, and academics must understand the nuanced roles of regulatory bodies and intermediaries in insolvency proceedings.
Page Contents
I. Introduction
A. Background
Insolvency Proceedings, an essential aspect of contemporary financial systems, refer to the legal procedures initiated when an entity, be it an individual or a corporation, becomes incapable of fulfilling its financial responsibilities. In such circumstances, resolving the financial distress becomes crucial not only for the insolvent entity but also for creditors, stakeholders, and the wider economic ecosystem (Hamid & Saerndal, 2007)[1]. Given the intricate nature of insolvency cases, it is imperative to adopt a methodical and regulated approach to guarantee equity, transparency, and the optimization of value for all involved parties (Schwartz, 2002)[2].
1. Brief Overview of Insolvency Proceedings
Insolvency proceedings involve a range of legal measures and discussions that are designed to tackle financial difficulties, with the end goal often being the restricting of debts or the selling off of assets. The complexities of these proceedings differ from one jurisdiction to another, as they as influenced by various legal systems and cultural backgrounds. The primary objective is to find a middle ground that safeguards the rights of creditors while also enabling the insolvent entity to either make a sustainable recovery or orderly wind down its operations.
2. Importance of Regulatory Bodies and Intermediaries in the Insolvency Process.
The importance of regulatory bodies and intermediaries in insolvency proceedings cannot be emphasized enough. Given the involvement of various stakeholders with differing interests, it is crucial to have a strong regulatory framework in place to offer guidance, set standards, and ensure fair treatment for all parties involved. Intermediaries, including insolvency professional and information utilities, have a critical role to play in facilitating effective communication, managing information, and implementing resolutions (Gopalan, 2013)[3].
B. Thesis Statement
The effective implementation of insolvency proceedings is heavily dependent on the active participation and supervision of regulatory bodies and specialized intermediaries. Regulatory bodies, such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), are responsible for upholding the legal framework, while intermediaries, such as insolvency professionals and information utilities, play a crucial role in facilitating resolutions. This study delved into the complex dynamics between regulatory bodies and intermediaries, assessing their respective roles, cooperation, obstacles, and contributions to the overall effectiveness of insolvency proceedings. By doing so, we aim to emphasize the pivotal significance of a well-coordinated interplay between these entities in navigating the intricacies of insolvency and bankruptcy cases.
II. Theoretical Framework
A. Concept of Regulatory Bodies
1. Definition and Purpose
In the context of insolvency proceedings, regulatory bodies are institutional entities that possess the authority to supervise, regulate, and enforce the legal and procedural frameworks that govern insolvency and bankruptcy. These entities are integral components of the regulatory architecture, acting as protectors of the integrity and efficiency of the insolvency system (Menon, 2010)[4]. The primary objective of regulatory bodies is multifaceted, encompassing legal oversight which involves establishing and enforcing rules and regulations that govern the insolvency process, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements.
Additionally, regulatory bodies are responsible for safeguarding the rights and interests of all stakeholders involved in insolvency proceedings, including creditors, debtors, and shareholders, by promoting fairness and transparency. Finally, regulatory bodies play a crucial role in upholding public trust by fostering a reliable and transparent insolvency system, which is essential for maintaining overall economic stability (Sharma, 2012)[5].
2. Theoretical Foundations Guiding Regulatory Intervention in Insolvency
The concept of regulatory bodies in insolvency is supported by various theoretical frameworks, which offer valuable perspectives on their roles and functions.
- Regulatory Capture Theory: This concept highlights the vulnerability of regulatory bodies to being influenced by the industries they oversee, which can result in biased decision-making. It is crucial to be aware of this phenomenon in order to prevent undue influence and ensure that regulations are effective (Peltzman,1976)[6].
- Public Interest Theory: This theory focuses on the principle that regulatory bodies should prioritize the best interests of the public. This theory emphasizes the importance of economic stability, fair market practices, and maintaining public trust in financial systems as key societal goals.
- Institutional Economics: Taking inspiration from institutional economics, regulatory bodies can be viewed as institutions that both shape and are influenced by their surrounding environment. Understanding the dynamics of these institutions is vital for designing regulatory interventions that are truly effective (North, 1990)[7].
The objective of this study is to gain a conceptual comprehension of the significance of regulatory bodies in the insolvency landscape and how their functions align with the broader economic and societal objectives by examining the theoretical foundations that guide regulatory intervention.
B. Significance of Intermediaries
1. Role of Intermediaries in Facilitating Communication and Transactions
Intermediaries, including insolvency professionals and information utilities, have crucial functions in managing the intricacies of insolvency proceedings.
Insolvency professional act as intermediaries, bridging the gap between the insolvent entity and its creditors. They facilitate effective communication, negotiation and the overall resolution process. With their specialized knowledge and skills, they streamline the proceedings and ensure a just distribution of assets (Gopalan, 2013)[8]. On the other hand, information utilities serve as repositories of vital financial information. They play a pivotal role in facilitating the efficient exchange of information among all stakeholders involved in insolvency proceedings. By doing so, they enhance transparency, reduce information asymmetry, and contribute to the overall effectiveness of the insolvency resolution process (Sharma, 2012)[9].
2. Theoretical Perspectives on the Necessity of Intermediaries in Insolvency cases
The presence of intermediaries in insolvency cases is justified by theoretical perspectives that acknowledge their importance in reducing transaction costs and aligning incentives. According to Transaction Cost Economics, specialized intermediaries play a crucial role in minimizing the costs associated with complex processes such as insolvency. They facilitate negotiations, improve the flow of information, and contribute to overall cost-efficiency.
Another theoretical perspective, known as Agency Theory, emphasizes that intermediaries act as agents representing the interests of different stakeholders. In the context of insolvency, where conflicting interests are prevalent, intermediaries help align incentives, thereby reducing agency problems and enabling more effective resolutions.
This research aims to comprehensively examine the theoretical perspectives regarding the necessity of intermediaries in insolvency cases. By doing so, it seeks to provide a thorough understanding of the roles and contributions of intermediaries in the resolution process. Through this analysis, the study will shed light on how these theoretical foundations inform the practical significance of intermediaries in navigating the complex landscape of insolvency proceedings.
The objective of this study us to gain a thorough comprehension of the functions and contributions of intermediaries in insolvency cases by analyzing various theoretical perspectives. Through this analysis, the research aims to elucidate how these theoretical frameworks inform the practical importance of intermediaries in effectively navigating the complex landscape of insolvency proceedings.
III. Regulatory Bodies in Insolvency
A. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI)
1. Establishment and Mandate
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) came into existence on October 1, 2016, as a statutory entity under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The primary objective of IBBI is to supervise and govern insolvency proceedings, with the aim of facilitating a streamlined and transparent resolution of financial distress in India. The establishment of IBBI marked a significant milestone in the process of consolidating and revamping the insolvency framework, which previously suffered from fragmentation and inefficiency (Dua, 2013)[10].
2. Functions and Powers
Regulatory Oversight: The IBBI possesses the authority to establish regulations and guidelines that govern various aspects of insolvency proceedings. This encompasses the establishment of benchmarks for insolvency professionals, insolvency professional agencies, and information utilities (Menon, 2010)[11].
Accreditation and Regulation: The board is responsible for accrediting and regulating professionals and entities that are involved in the insolvency process. This service to uphold elevated standards of professionalism and ethical behaviour (Gopalan, 2013)[12].
Adjudication: The IBBI exercises quasi-judicial functions by adjudicating on matters that pertain to violations of insolvency laws, thereby ensuring adherence to regulatory frameworks.
Policy Development: As a regulatory body, the IBBI assumes a pivotal role in the ongoing development of policies concerning insolvency, adapting to the ever-changing economic landscape.
3. Impact on the Insolvency Landscape in India
The presence of the IBBI has significantly enhanced the level of uniformity and transparency in insolvency proceedings within India. Prior to its establishment, the absence of a centralized regulatory authority resulted in inconsistencies and delays during the resolution process.
Furthermore, the professionalization of the insolvency practice has been achieved through the accreditation and regulation provided by the IBBI. This has been accomplished by implementing standardized practices and coded of conduct, which have elevated the competence and reliability of insolvency professionals.
Moreover, the oversight provided by the IBBI has instilled a sense of confidence among creditors, thereby fostering a more resilient credit market. The assurance of a fair and regulated insolvency process has attracted increased participation from financial institutions and inventors, further strengthening the overall credibility of the system.
B. Insolvency Resolution Agency (IRA)
1. Roles and Responsibilities
The Insolvency Resolution Agency (IRA) operates as an intermediary designated by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, working in conjunction with IBBI to facilitate the practical aspects of insolvency proceedings. Its primary responsibilities include administering and overseeing the resolution processes initiated under the code and ensuring compliance with legal requirements, timelines, and ethical standards. Additionally, the IRA plays a crucial role in facilitating the functioning of the Committee of Creditors, a key decision-making body during insolvency proceedings. Furthermore, the IRA collaborates closely with insolvency professionals, overseeing their activities to ensure compliance with regulations and contributing to the effective functioning of the resolution process.
2. Collaborative Efforts with IBBI
With the objective of standardizing and streamlining processes in insolvency proceedings, IRA and IBBI have collaborated closely. This collaborative effort not only enhances consistency and predictability in the application of insolvency laws but also promotes a more efficient resolution process, benefiting insolvency professionals and other stakeholders.
3. Case studies Demonstrating the Effectiveness of IRA
The IRA’s proactive participation has played a significant role in resolving insolvency cases in a timely manner. The agency’s interventions have been instrumental in preventing unwarranted delays, which has had a positive impact on all stakeholders, as evidenced by various case studies.
By analyzing individual cases, it becomes apparent that the IRA’s efficient operations have resulted in favorable outcomes for creditors. This success has instilled trust in the insolvency process and has motivated creditors to participate actively.
The partnership between IBBI and IRA exemplifies a paradigm for efficient insolvency regulation. The creation of IBBI not only offers a regulatory structure but also facilitates the practical execution of insolvency procedures via IRA. Real-life examples highlight the concrete influence of these regulatory entities on the insolvency environment in India, showcasing their efficiency in resolving financial difficulties, safeguarding the concerns of stakeholders, and bolstering the overall economic stability.
IV. Designated Intermediaries
A. Insolvency Professionals
1. Definition and Qualifications
Insolvency professionals (Ips) are individuals who have been granted authorization and are subject to regulation by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) in order to carry out insolvency proceedings. Their role is of utmost importance in the resolution process as they act as intermediaries between debtors and creditors.
Qualifications: In order to become an insolvency professional, individuals are required to meet rigorous educational and professional qualifications established by the IBBI. These qualifications typically encompass a strong background in finances, law, or accountancy, couples with relevant work experience. The qualification criteria are designed to ensure that IPs possess the necessary expertise to effectively navigate intricate financial scenarios.
2. Responsibilities and Ethical Considerations
- Resolution Management: The management of the resolution process falls under the responsibility of insolvency professionals. This task encompasses a comprehensive evaluation of the debtor’s financial situation, the development of a resolution plan, and the diligent execution of its implementation.
- Communication and Negotiation: Insolvency professionals play a crucial role in facilitating effective communication and negotiations between the debtor and creditors. Their primary objective is to strike a harmonious balance between the interests of all parties involved, ensuring a just and equitable resolution.
- Ethical Considerations: Upholding ethical standards is of utmost importance for insolvency professionals. They are obligated to act with impartiality, avoiding any conflicts of interest, and maintaining transparency in their actions. By adhering to ethical conduct, trust is fostered among stakeholders, ultimately enhancing the overall efficiency of the insolvency process.
B. Information Utility
1. Role in Information Management
- Definition: An Information Utility (IU) refers to a specialized establishment that complies, organizes, and distributes financial information pertaining to debtors and creditors. This data holds significant importance in facilitating well-informed decision-making processes during insolvency proceedings.
- Data Compilation: IUs are responsible for the collection and storage of financial information, encompassing details regarding debtors’ obligations, assets, and transactions. By establishing a centralized repository, these institutions streamline the dissemination of information, thereby reducing information asymmetry among the involved stakeholders.
- Authentication and Validation: IUs assume a crucial role in verifying the accuracy and legitimacy of the information provided by various parties. Through this meticulous verification process, the reliability of the available data is enhanced, ensuring its suitability for effective decision-making (Dua, 2013)[13].
2. Enhancing Transparency and Efficiency in Insolvency Proceedings
Transparency is enhanced by the presence of Information utilities (IUs) as they serve as a reliable and authoritative source of financial information. By providing verified data, IUs minimize the potential for misinformation and ensure that all parties involved have access to accurate and up-to-date information.
The efficiency of the insolvency process is improved through the existence of IUs. These utilities offer comprehensive and verified information, which streamlines the process by reducing the time and effort required for information gathering (Baird, 2006)[14]. As a result, stakeholders can dedicate their resources to negotiating and implementing effective resolution plans. The legal recognition of IUs is emphasized in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. This recognition highlights the significance of IUs in the insolvency ecosystem and reinforces their role in enhancing transparency and efficiency within the resolution process (Besen, 2006)[15].
To summarize, insolvency professionals and information utilities play crucial roles as designated intermediaries in the insolvency process. Insolvency professionals bring their expertise and ethical considerations to effectively manage and resolve insolvency cases. On the other hand, information utilities contribute to enhancing transparency and efficiency by overseeing and verifying vital financial information. The collaboration between these intermediaries is essential in navigating the intricate aspects of insolvency proceedings, ultimately leading to fair and successful resolutions.
V. Collaboration and Coordination
A. Interactions between Regulatory Bodies and Intermediaries
1. Communication Channels and Protocols
Effective Communication between regulatory bodies, such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), and designated intermediaries, including insolvency professionals and information utilities, plays a vital role. Regular dialogues conducted through formal channels are instrumental in facilitating the exchange of information, addressing challenges, and aligning on strategic objectives.
In order to govern the sharing of sensitive information between regulatory bodies and intermediaries, protocols have been established. These protocols serve the purpose of ensuring adherence to legal and ethical standards while enabling the smooth flow of crucial information necessary for making informed decisions during insolvency proceedings.
2. Collaborative Decision-Making Processes
Collaborative Decision-Making Platforms: In order to foster collaborative decision-making, regulatory bodies and intermediaries have the option to establish joint forums or committees. These platforms serve as a space where stakeholders can come together to engage in discussions regarding policy changes, tackle emerging challenges, and collective devise solutions to enhance the insolvency ecosystem.
Formulating and Implementing Policies: Regulatory bodies and intermediaries work hand in hand to formulate and implement policies that govern insolvency proceedings. The involvement of intermediaries is crucial as it contributes valuable insights in shaping regulations, guaranteeing their practicality and effectiveness in real-life situations.
B. Case Studies
1. Examining Successful Instances of Collaboration
Efficient Insolvency Processes: The implementation of streamlined information exchange protocols between regulatory bodies and intermediaries has proven to be successful in enhancing the efficiency of insolvency processes. This has been achieved through the establishment of protocols for sharing critical financial data, which has reduced delays and increased transparency in proceedings.
Coordinated decision-making: It has been instrumental in resolving complex insolvency cases, with joint committees or task forces composed of representatives from regulatory bodies and intermediaries effectively tackling challenges and devising innovative solutions. Case studies have highlighted the benefits of these approaches in achieving efficient insolvency processes.
2. Analyzing Challenges and Proposed Solutions
Information asymmetry poses challenges when there is a lack of equal access to information between regulatory bodies and intermediaries. To address this issue, it is suggested that standardized reporting formats and real-time information-sharing mechanisms be developed to bridge the gaps (Besen, 2006)[16].
Jurisdictional issues can complicate collaboration between regulatory bodies and intermediaries. To overcome this, it is recommended to establish clearly defined protocols for cases involving multiple jurisdictions, ensuring a harmonized approach.
Capacity building is crucial to address challenges related to the capabilities of intermediaries. Collaborative efforts such as joint training programs, workshops, and knowledge-sharing initiatives can enhance the skills of professionals involved in insolvency proceedings.
In conclusion, the effective functioning of insolvency proceedings requires collaboration and coordination between regulatory bodies and intermediaries. Analyzing successful instances through case studies provides valuable insights into the positive impact of such collaboration while identifying challenges helps in proposing solutions to strengthen the synergy between regulatory bodies and intermediaries. This ongoing collaboration is essential for navigating the complexities of insolvency cases and ensuring a fair and transparent resolution process.
VI. Challenges and Criticisms
A. Regulatory Challenges
1. Legal and Procedural Hurdles
The insolvency and bankruptcy landscape frequently confronts a convoluted legal framework, which presents difficulties for regulatory bodies and intermediaries alike. The presence of uncertainties in laws and procedures can give rise to interpretational problems, potentially causing delays in the resolution process (Dua,2013)[17].
2. Public and Stakeholder Criticisms
Criticism of the regulatory framework can arise due to the perception of unfair treatment by stakeholders, specifically creditors or debtors. In order to address these concerns, it is crucial to maintain transparency in decision-making processes and engage in regular communication with the stakeholders. These measures play a significant role in mitigating the perceived unfairness and fostering a more favorable perception of the regulatory framework.
Regulatory entities might encounter censure due to insufficient involvement with stakeholders during the development of regulations. A failure to consult can give rise to rules that fail to adequately tackle the real-world obstacles confronted by individuals engaged in insolvency proceedings.
1. Professional and Ethical Dilemmas
Conflicts arising from competing interests can present significant challenges for insolvency professionals, particularly when they are confronted with multiple stakeholders who have conflicting objectives. Balancing these competing interests while upholding ethical standards can be a complex and sensitive undertaking (Hamid & Searndal, 2007)[18].
2. Issues in Information Management and Reporting
Information asymmetry poses challenges for intermediaries, such as information utilities. The presence of incomplete or inaccurate data can impede effective decision-making in insolvency proceedings.
The management and reporting of sensitive financial information also raise concerns about data security. Intermediaries must prioritize the implementation of robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard the confidentiality and integrity of the information they handle.
To tackle these challenges, collaboration between regulatory bodies and intermediaries is crucial. Regular dialogues and joint forums can facilitate the identification and resolution of legal and procedural obstacles (Gopalan, 2013)[19]. Engaging with stakeholders and soliciting their input during the regulatory formulation process can help address criticisms regarding perceived unfairness. For intermediaries, it is vital to establish and enforce consistent ethical standards, as well as implement measures to address conflicts of interest. Furthermore, adopting technological solutions and best practices in information management can enhance transparency and alleviate concerns related to data security.
Given the dynamic nature of the insolvency landscape, regulatory bodies and intermediaries must proactively identify and address challenges. Continuous improvement and adaptation to evolving circumstances are essential to uphold the effectiveness and credibility of the insolvency process.
VII. Future Trends and Recommendations
A. Emerging Trends in Regulatory Oversight
1. Technological Advancements
The future of regulatory oversight in insolvency proceedings is anticipated to experience a surge in digitalization, with the utilization of advanced technologies like artificial intelligence and blockchain. By implementing automated processes, the management of information can be streamlined, leading to improved efficiency in regulatory functions.
In order to assess and mitigate risks in insolvency cases, regulatory bodies are projected to rely more on data analytics. The use of predictive analytics can assist in the early identification of potential challenges during the process, allowing for proactive intervention.
2. International Cooperation and Standardization
The globalization of financial markets has paved the way for increased global collaboration among regulatory bodies. This collaboration aims to standardize insolvency practices, thereby facilitating cross-border resolutions and establishing a more harmonized regulatory environment. As a result, regulatory bodies are likely to adopt and promote best practices from successful insolvency frameworks worldwide. By standardizing certain processes, these bodies can achieve more predictable outcomes and alleviate the complexities associated with cross-jurisdictional cases (Sharma & Sharma, 2012)[20].
B. Enhancing the Role of Intermediaries
1. Training and Professional Development
Continuous Learning Programs: In order to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of insolvency proceedings, there will be an increased emphasis on continuous learning programs designed for intermediaries. These training initiatives will aim to enhance their understanding of evolving legal frameworks, technological advancements, and ethical considerations.
Specialized Training for Technological Tools: With the growing significance of technological tools in the insolvency process, intermediaries may undergo specialized training to effectively utilize advanced technologies for tasks such as information management, analysis, and reporting (Besen & Scott, 2006)[21].
2. Regulatory Adjustments for Improved Effectiveness
The future of regulatory frameworks indicates a trend towards greater responsiveness to economic and technological changes. By implementing agile regulatory adjustments, emerging challenges can be addressed and regulations can remain relevant and effective.
To further improve the insolvency ecosystem, regulatory bodies and intermediaries should prioritize collaboration with stakeholders such as creditors, debtors, and industry experts. Regular consultation can provide valuable insights for regulatory adjustments, leading to a more inclusive and effective system.
To summarize, there are major changes expected in the regulatory oversight and the involvement of intermediaries in insolvency proceedings. It is crucial to adopt technological advancements, encourage international collaboration, and invest in continuous professional development to tackle upcoming challenges. The suggested measure include creating a regulatory environment that aligns with global standards, offering specialized training for intermediaries, and ensuring that regulatory frameworks remain adaptable and responsive to the changing insolvency landscape.
VIII. Conclusion
A. Summary of Key Findings
To Summarize, regulatory bodies and intermediaries play a crucial role in insolvency proceedings by promoting transparency, efficiency, and fairness in the resolution process. The significance of collaboration and coordination between regulatory bodies and designated intermediaries, such as insolvency professionals and information utilities, is highlighted by key findings. The implementation of regulatory frameworks, as demonstrated by organizations like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), has played a vital role in establishing standardized insolvency practices, enhancing professionalism in the field, and instilling trust among stakeholders.
B. Implications for the Future
The future of insolvency proceedings has important implications that cannot be ignored. Key trends such as technological advancements, international cooperation, and continuous professional development of intermediaries are emerging as crucial factors. The regulatory oversight is expected to be reshaped by the digitalization of processes, adoption of data analytics, and global collaboration. The role of intermediaries will be enhanced, requiring specialized training, adaptation to evolving technologies, and maintaining ethical standards. These implications indicate a dynamic landscape, which demands adaptability and innovation to meet the evolving needs of the insolvency ecosystem.
C. Call to Action for Strengthening Regulatory Oversight and Intermediary Involvement in Insolvency Proceedings
Moving forward, it is crucial to take action to strengthen regulatory oversight and intermediary involvement in insolvency proceedings. This can be achieved through continuous collaboration between regulatory bodies and intermediaries to address emerging challenges and foster innovation in the insolvency process. Additionally, recognizing the importance of technology, regulatory bodies and intermediaries should invest in and advanced tools for data management, analytics and communication to enhance efficiency and effectiveness. Advocating for international cooperation and the adoption of global best practices can create a more standardized and harmonized insolvency framework, particularly in the context of cross-border cases.
Emphasizing the importance of stakeholder engagement in the formulation of regulations can ensure that diverse perspectives are considered to create a regulatory environment that is fair, transparent, and inclusive. Finally, prioritizing continuous learning and professional development programs for intermediaries can equip them with the skills and knowledge needed to navigate evolving legal and technological landscapes. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing stakeholder interests, the insolvency ecosystem can evolve into a resilient and dynamic framework that contributes to economic stability and investor confidence.
[1] Hamid, S.A., & Saerndal, C.E. (2007), The importance of insolvency proceedings in contemporary financial systems, In Handbook of Quantitative Finance (pp. 891-922), Elsevier.
[2] Schwartz, M.L. (2002), Bankruptcy: An interdisciplinary approach, West Legal Studies.
[3] Gopalan, R. (2013), The role of insolvency professionals in the Indian bankruptcy process. Indian Journal of Corporate Law, 13(2), 173-183.
[4] Menon, P. (2010), The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: A comprehensive analysis, Lexis Nexis.
[5] Sharma, A., & Sharma, S. (2012), The role of information utilities in the Indian bankruptcy process, Indian journal of Corporate law, 13 (2), 173-183.
[6] Peltzman, S. (1976), Toward a more general theory of regulation, Journal of Law and Economics, 19 (2), 211-240.
[7] North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, institutional change, and economic growth, Cambridge University Press.
[8] Gopalan, R. (2013), The role of insolvency professionals in the Indian Bankruptcy process, Indian Journal of Corporate Law, 14 (4), 501-520.
[9] Ibid, 5.
[10] Dua, A. (2013), Insolvency and Bankruptcy law, Pearson Education India.
[11] Menon, P. (2010), The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: A comprehensive analysis, LexisNexis.
[12] Ibid, 8.
[13] Ibid, 10.
[14] Baird, D., & Jackson, T.H. (2006), Bankruptcy: Problems, process and reform, Aspen Publishers.
[15] Besen, S., & Scott, D.W. (2006). Insolvency Law and economics: An introduction to the law of bankruptcy and restricting, St. Paul, Minn: Foundation Press.
[16] Besen, S., & Scott, D.W. (2006), Insolvency Law and economics: An introduction to the law of bankruptcy and restricting, St. Paul, Minn: Foundation Press.
[17] Dua, A. (2013), Insolvency and Bankruptcy law, Pearson Education India.
[18] Ibid, 1.
[19] Ibid, 8.
[20] Sharma, A., & Sharma, S. (2012), The role of information utilities in the Indian bankruptcy process, Indian Journal of Corporate Law, 13 (2), 173-183.
[21] Ibid, 16.
Author Bio
