Case Law Details
Case Name : Cairn India Ltd. Vs I. M. Changla (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Merely requires the Chairman’s Report to state accurately the number inter-alia of persons who were present and who voted at the meeting either in person or by proxy, their individual values and the way they voted.
ORAL JUDGEMENT :-
The Petitioner seeks an order sanctioning a scheme of arrangement between itself and four transfer or companies Cairn Energy India Pvt. Ltd. (“CEIPL”), Cairn Energy India West B.V., (“CE India West”), Cairn Energy Cam bay B.V. (“CE Cam bay”) and Cairn Energy Gujarat B.V. (“CE Gujarat”). The first transfer-or co...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

