Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT rules co-ownership doesn’t imply tax liability. Sale proceeds taxed only for the beneficial owner, not co-owner in V...
Income Tax : Understand advance tax rules, due dates, and penalties for non-compliance. Learn how to avoid interest charges under sections 234B...
Income Tax : Receiving an income tax notice can be disconcerting, particularly for individuals who are not well-versed with tax laws and compli...
Income Tax : Discover key highlights of India's Income Tax Bill 2025, effective April 2026, featuring simplified tax structures, revised slabs,...
Income Tax : Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of TOLA to reassessment notices under the Income Tax Act, addressing the interplay with ...
Income Tax : Get insights on key amendments in the Income-tax Act, 1961, including changes to Sections 9A, 44BBD, 10(10D), and 158BB under the ...
Income Tax : JAOs face workload imbalances, limited manpower, and systemic issues post-Faceless Assessment Scheme. Suggestions for better resou...
Income Tax : ITGOA urges CBDT to address workload imbalances in JAO charges. Proposes systematic reorganization to ensure equitable distributio...
Income Tax : IT officials can access digital records during searches under IT Act, 1961, but personal emails and social media access is not all...
Income Tax : The updated return facility encourages voluntary tax compliance, allowing taxpayers to correct income omissions. Proposal to exten...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune ruled that Section 68 applies only to amounts credited in the relevant year. Addition of ₹10L as unexplained cash cred...
Income Tax : Asha Viren Raj Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Asha Viren Raj Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) case revolves around the contentious issue of reassess...
Income Tax : Gauhati High Court held that addition merely on the basis of retracted statement without any other relied upon evidence/ material ...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur quashes addition of suppressed school fees for Pushpa Vidya Niketan, stating survey statements lack evidentiary value...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai rules that the 10% tolerance limit under Section 50C/56(2)(x) is curative and applies retrospectively, impacting prope...
Income Tax : On 29 March 2025, the President of India granted assent to the Finance Act 2025, marking a significant milestone in the country’...
Income Tax : The Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board receives tax exemption for specified income from FY 2023-24 to 2027-28 under Sec...
Income Tax : CBDT amends Income Tax Rules, effective April 1, 2025, revising Form 3CD, MSME interest provisions, buyback reporting, and loan/de...
Income Tax : The Government of India keeps Small Savings Schemes interest rates unchanged for Q1 FY 2025-26 (April–June 2025), as per the Min...
Income Tax : CBDT circular allows waiver of TDS/TCS interest under sections 201(1A)/206C(7) due to technical errors. Details on eligibility and...
Order u/s 34AD of the Wealth Tax Act. 1957 In exercise of the powers conferred on the Chief Commissioner or Director General of Income Tax under section 34AD of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, I, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-03, Delhi hereby having regard to the conditions prescribed in Section 34AD of the W.T.Act, 1957, remove the names of the below mentioned registered valuers from the Register of Valuers maintained in the 0/o Pr.CCIT, Delhi with immediate effect:
Girraj Prasad Gilara HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) The revenue has not disputed that the assessee has raised the objections vide letter dated 19th July, 2016 against the notice issued under section 148 of the IT Act. Assessee has raised the objections against the reopening of the assessment on the ground that there is no […]
Shin-Etsu Polymers India P. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) We have observed that the authorities below have commented while disallowing these foreign exchange losses on conversion of outstanding balance in foreign currency into Indian rupee on the date of Balance Sheet as at year end to be on account of outstanding unsecured loans which were […]
The issue under consideration is whether the sum of admission fees paid to stock exchange will be allowed as capital expenditure? In light of Hon’ble Supreme Court judgement in the case of Techno Shares and Stocks Limited (supra) membership of stock exchange is to be treated as a capital asset.
When you file your TDS/TCS return, first the details regarding deposit of TDS/TCS made by you is compared with the data given by banks. The data is uploaded by banks on the basis of the TDS/TCS challans received by them. For this purpose, the Challan Identification Number (CIN), TAN and TDS amount as given in your TDS/TCS return is compared with the corresponding details given in the challan details provided by the bank that has accepted the tax. (CIN consists of the BSR code of the branch where you deposited the tax, date on which you deposited tax and the challan serial number which have been stamped on the counter foil of the challan given to you.)
DCIT Vs Ocwen Financial Solutions Pvt. Ltd.(ITAT Bangalore) Facts- 1. Treatment of expenditure incurred on buy-back of shares- An assessee has spent amount of INR 8,90,961 on buy-back of shares and debited the same to Profit & Loss Account treating the same as ‘revenue expenditure’. AO treated the same as ‘capital expenditure’. 2. Set-off of […]
The issue under consideration is whether the stay of demand will be granted for the 2nd time to the assessee or not?
State Bank of India Vs. Vineet Agrawal (Bombay High Court) we are of the considered opinion that no reasonable view can be taken that there was failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for its assessment for the assessment year 1990-91. If that be so then […]
Disallowance made by AO under section 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of TDS on discount/rebate allowed to dealers/distributors on sale of products was not justified as there was no element of work as defined under clause (iv) of Explanation to section 194C and AO had not brought on record any material for deduction of TDS under section 194H that the dealers/distributors were simply acting as intermediaries to facilitate sale of products to end users so as to infer a principal–agent relationship.
The issue under consideration is whether the penalty u/s 271C levied due to failure to deduct tax at source (TDS) on LTA paid to employee is justified in law?
