Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : Analysis of CESTAT Kolkata's decision in Mahavir Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs CGST & Central Excise, focusing on alleged clandestine ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Kolkata allows CENVAT Credit to Rexon Strips Ltd., ruling that inputs used in capital goods are eligible, setting aside pri...
Excise Duty : Appellant and SKF India are both subsidiaries of AB SKF Sweden. Appellant & SKF India have agreed to pool & combine their respecti...
Excise Duty : The Settlement Commission held that the rectification of errors under Section 154 was confined to arithmetical or clerical errors ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court held that the agreement between the oil marketing companies indicates that the price of petroleum products agreed un...
Excise Duty : Govt extends provisions under Excise Notification 11/2017 from 2025 to 2026. Changes take effect on February 2, 2025....
Excise Duty : Notification 01/2025 outlines appointments and roles of Central Excise Officers for handling appeals under the Excise Act, specify...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notification No. 08/2022 with immediate effect under public interest provisions....
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance amends Central Excise Rules, 2017, removing specific provisos in Rules 18 and 19. Changes take effect imme...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notifications No. 10/2022 and 11/2022 under Notification No. 30/2024, effective im...
Held that the conclusion that mere non-payment of duties is not equivalent to collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of fact is untenable as the Act contemplates a positive action which betrays a negative intent of wilful default.
CBIC directs that powers exercisable by CBIC under rule 3 of Central Excise Rules, 2017 and rule 3 of Service Tax Rules, 1994, may be exercised also by-(a) Principal Chief Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax; or (b) Chief Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax,
Seeks to amend No. 10/2022-Central Excise, dated the 30th June, 2022, to reduce the Road and Infrastructure Cess on export of Petrol vide Notification No. 20/2022-Central Excise | Dated: 19th July, 2022. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) New Delhi, the 19th July, 2022 Notification No. 20/2022-Central Excise G.S.R. 586(E).— In exercise of the powers […]
Seeks to exempt the excisable goods, namely Petrol, Diesel and Aviation Turbine Fuel from Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) and Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC) when exported from units located in the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) vide Notification No. 19/2022-Central Excise | Dated: 19th July, 2022. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) New Delhi, the 19th […]
CBIC reduces Special Additional Excise Duty on production of Petroleum Crude and export of Aviation Turbine Fuel vide Notification No. 18/2022-Central Excise | Dated: 19th July, 2022. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) New Delhi Notification No. 18/2022-Central Excise | Dated: 19th July, 2022 G.S.R. 584(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 5A of the Central Excise […]
Seeks to amend No. 04/2022-Central Excise, dated the 30th June, 2022, to reduce the Special Additional Excise Duty on exports of Petrol and Diesel vide Notification No. 17/2022-Central Excise Dated: 19th July, 2022. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) New Delhi Notification No. 17/2022-Central Excise | Dated: 19th July, 2022 G.S.R. 583(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by […]
Held that Rule 16 allows the assessee to avail the cenvat credit of duty paid on the goods cleared by them, as if such goods are received as inputs
MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 15th July, 2022 Notification No. 16/2022-Central Excise G.S.R. 579(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to […]
K K Spun India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise Customs and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Learned Counsel for the appellant urges that the show cause notice is mis-conceived, as the finished products manufactured by the appellant are not exempted, rather are dutiable @ 10% ad valorem as per CTH 68109990 under the Central Excise […]
Bellatrix Consultancy Services Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (Karnataka High Court) It is not in dispute that assessee had paid service tax on an erroneous assumption that it was liable to pay the taxes. The Assessing Authority has allowed a part of the claim. Thus, according to the Assessing Authority, appellant is not liable to […]
