Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Explore 45 FAQs on EDs search, investigation, seizure, and arrest processes, including recent proceedings against high-profile fig...
Corporate Law : MP HC urges immediate implementation of Uniform Civil Code in X vs State of Madhya Pradesh, stressing its necessity beyond mere le...
Corporate Law : Learn the process to change the name of a trademark applicant or user on the Trademark India portal. Follow our detailed guide for...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC rules mere association with Dawood Ibrahim doesn't qualify as terror gang membership under UAPA. Key insights from Parve...
Corporate Law : Discover how institutional investor rules affect local corporate governance in India, the USA, and the UK, and their overall impac...
Corporate Law : Discover the 'Vatsalya' pension scheme for minors launched by the Ministry of Finance. Learn about contributions, conversion optio...
Corporate Law : Union Budget 2024 introduces eight new MSME support measures, including credit schemes, enhanced Mudra loans, and new SIDBI branch...
Corporate Law : New centrally sponsored scheme announced: 20 lakh youth to be skilled, 1,000 ITIs upgraded, and skill loan limits increased to ₹...
Corporate Law : Govt launches 3 employment schemes: wage support for new workers, incentives for manufacturing jobs, and employer support to boost...
Corporate Law : Finance Ministry's new capital gains tax: Short-term gains at 20%, long-term at 12.5%. Exemption limit raised to ₹1.25 lakh for ...
Corporate Law : Explore the Competition Commission of India’s decision in Anil Bansal vs. Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited, focusing on allega...
Corporate Law : Competition Commission of India dismissed allegations against sugar mills and associations for bid-rigging and price-fixing in the...
Corporate Law : Saint Gobain India Pvt. Ltd. faces allegations of anti-competitive practices under the Competition Act, 2002, involving exclusive ...
Corporate Law : Read the full text of the Bombay High Court judgment ordering Rs. 10 lakh compensation for harassment of a Chinese woman by Custom...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi ruled that financial creditors who are allottees under RERA must meet the threshold criteria to file a Section 7 appli...
Corporate Law : Latest updates to the Prevention of Money-laundering Rules, 2024, focusing on KYC processes, client verification, and record maint...
Corporate Law : Explore IRDAI's final order on Aegon Life Insurance (now Bandhan Life) regarding violations of AML and policyholder protection reg...
Corporate Law : Explore India Post's new operational guidelines for bulk customers of registered articles, including eligibility, registration pro...
Corporate Law : MHA issues guidelines to ensure nondiscriminatory prison visitation rights for LGBTQ+ community, emphasizing equal treatment in al...
Corporate Law : Participate in the public consultation on amending Rule 3 of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011. Deadline: 29....
In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) observed that where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdiction.
In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails the order dated 05.05.2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh allowing the appeal and dismissing order dated 28.01.2013 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhatinda.
Explore impact of Jan Vishwas Act 2023 on Legal Metrology Act, 2009. Discover revised penalties and its role in promoting ease of doing business.
Discover how beneficiaries play a crucial role in maximizing impact of CSR initiatives. Learn about their responsibilities and benefits of active participation
In present facts of the case, the Revision Petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails order dated 06.02.2015 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 assailing the order dated 11.08.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur.
In present facts of the case, it was held that findings of State Commission that the patient and his family members were not informed about the risk nor their consent was obtained, do not suffer from any illegality as procedure/risk was explained to the patient.
In present facts of the case, the Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 14.12.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’).
In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) have refused to condone the delay for 125 days as no ‘sufficient cause’ was shown because there was difference in oral submissions and the contents of the Application submitted.
In present facts of the case, the Complaint of the patient was dismissed and it was observed that it is natural that if any patient consults with a doctor, then he would inform about all alternative modes of treatment.
