Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Understand income tax rebate u/s 87A and LTCG tax u/s 112A under the new tax regime for FY 2024-25 with calculation rules, limits,...
Income Tax : Tax loss harvesting is a tax planning strategy that allows taxpayers, especially investors, to lower their capital gains tax liabi...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai rules unaccounted customer deposits, with traceable identities and commercial substance, are liabilities, not income ...
Income Tax : Understand Form 15G & 15H for no TDS on interest. Learn who should file, deadlines, online submission, and penalty details....
Income Tax : Section 119(2)(b) allows delayed ITR filings with valid reasons. Revised limits, conditions, and judicial insights guide this less...
Income Tax : ITAT enables e-filing and virtual hearings; over 26,000 e-filings and 1.22 lakh video hearings conducted till Feb 2025, per Minist...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill 2025 proposes tax exemption on income up to ₹12 lakh, revised tax slabs, and a ₹75,000 standard deduction for...
Income Tax : A summary of corporate tax concessions in India, including key deductions, exemptions, and revenue impact from 2021-24 under the I...
Income Tax : Get insights on key amendments in the Income-tax Act, 1961, including changes to Sections 9A, 44BBD, 10(10D), and 158BB under the ...
Income Tax : JAOs face workload imbalances, limited manpower, and systemic issues post-Faceless Assessment Scheme. Suggestions for better resou...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai rules on Sakthi Realty case, deleting additions for unexplained deposits. Details on customer deposits, tax assessmen...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat rules penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) must be limited to first default, not per notice. Penalty reduced to ₹10,000 d...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat rules no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) if income is assessed on estimate. Penalty deleted as disallowances were based...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata rules Sec 263 cannot exceed reassessment scope, limits revision period. Disallowances u/s 40A(3) sent back for scruti...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that addition merely on the basis of entries found in the seized diary without any corroborative evidence and with...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : CBDT introduces ITR-B for search and seizure cases under section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, effective from 1st September 2024....
Income Tax : CBDT sets 30 April 2025 as the last date to file declarations under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024....
Income Tax : HUDCO bonds issued after April 1, 2025, notified as long-term assets under Section 54EC for capital gains exemption, usable for in...
Income Tax : CBDT grants tax exemption to Prayagraj Mela Pradhikaran under section 10(46A) of the Income-tax Act, effective from assessment yea...
Infosys Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The relevant ground with regard to the above issue are grounds 9.1 to 9.3. The Special Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Nagarjuna Fertilizders and Chemicals Ltd. v. ACIT reported in (2017) 78 taxmann.com 264 had held if rate of tax applicable under DTAA is lower than […]
Chinna Ponnu Ammal Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) After perusal of Form No.10B as placed on record, it could be seen that the assessee has applied an amount of Rs.5,55,57,015/- for the purpose of charitable trust. However, as per Explanation-3 to Sec.11(1), the disallowance of Rs.48,69,504/- u/s 40(a)(ia) would not be considered as application of […]
Sri Suhas Suresh Shet Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In the matter of condonation of delay in filing appeals beyond the limitation period, the courts are empowered to condone the delay, provided the litigant is able to demonstrate that there was ‘sufficient cause’ in preferring appeal beyond the limitation period. The Courts have also held that […]
AXA France Vie Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) It is evident, the demand in dispute is as a result of disallowance made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act due to alleged non-compliance with the provisions of section 194D of the Act. It is the claim of the assessee that the provision contained under section 194D is […]
Discover why income tax is not as effective as it seems in developing nations. Explore the historical context and impact of income tax policies.
CBDT notifies Sharada Institute of Indian Management Research Foundation Trust under section 35(1)(iii) read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 vide Notification No. 33/2022-Income Tax Dated- 19th April, 2022. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi, the 19th April, 2022 Notification No. 33/2022-Income Tax S.O. 1875(E).—In […]
Discover the lesser-known provisions of the Income Tax Act and enhance your understanding of income tax law.
Income Tax Department Government of India Central Board of Direct Taxes, e-Filing Project ITR 4 – Validation Rules for AY 2022-23 Version 1.0 19th April 2022 Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) E-2, A.R.A. Centre, Ground Floor Jhandewalan Extension New Delhi – 110055 Document Revision List Document Name: ITR 4 – Validation Rules for AY 2022-23 […]
In reassessment it is only required to see whether there is prima facie material before the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings and other requirements under the law, precondition i.e. of taking approval/sanction under Section 151, before issuance of notice under Section 148 is followed or not. Whether there is prima facie material available on the basis of which department can reopen case and not sufficiency or correctness of material to be considered.
Where there was delay in handing over possession to homebuyers, there was remedy available to the Consumer under Consumer Protection Act and Real Estate Regular Act which run parallel side by side. Moreover, one sided clauses in Agreement amounted to unfair trade practice and could not govern the refund mechanism therefore, refund was allowable to assessee with 9% interest from the date of deposit allowed.
