Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
State Bank of India Vs. Vineet Agrawal (Bombay High Court) we are of the considered opinion that no reasonable view can be taken that there was failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for its assessment for the assessment year 1990-91. If that be so then […]
Ministry of Finance Recommendations of the 42nd GST Council Meeting Posted On: 05 OCT 2020 The 42nd GST Council met under the Chairmanship of Union Finance & Corporate Affairs Minister Smt Nirmala Sitharaman through video conferencing here today. The meeting was also attended by Union Minister of State for Finance & Corporate Affairs Shri Anurag […]
The issue under consideration is whether the lower authority is correct in stating that the appellant is not entitled to avail credit of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods since they have cleared the said exempted goods for export outside India?
In exercise of powers conferred by section 45ZB of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Central Government constitutes Monetary Policy Committee of RBI
Securities and Exchange Board of India CIRCULAR SEBI/HO/IMD/DF3/CIR/P/2020/197 October 05, 2020 All Mutual Funds/ Asset Management Companies (AMCs)/ Trustee Companies/Boards of Trustees of Mutual Funds/ Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI) Sir/ Madam, Subject: Product Labeling in Mutual Fund schemes – Risk-o-meter 1. Please refer to SEBI circular no. CIR/IMD/DF/5/2013 dated March 18, 2013 […]
There is a need to clearly communicate to the investor that, under dividend option of a Mutual Fund Scheme, certain portion of his capital (Equalization Reserve) can be distributed as dividend.
Disallowance made by AO under section 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of TDS on discount/rebate allowed to dealers/distributors on sale of products was not justified as there was no element of work as defined under clause (iv) of Explanation to section 194C and AO had not brought on record any material for deduction of TDS under section 194H that the dealers/distributors were simply acting as intermediaries to facilitate sale of products to end users so as to infer a principal–agent relationship.
Background E-Invoicing is not a new concept if we talk about other countries in the world, though proposed to be implemented in India for the first time. Hence, it can be said to be a new concept in context of Indian tax administration. Basic idea of introducing e-invoicing is to have a standard to ensure […]
Notification No. 02/2020-Central Excise (N.T.) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, appoints the officer specified in column (2) of the table below to act as a common adjudicating authority and invests him with all the powers of Central Excise Officers specified in column (3) of the said table to be exercised for such purposes as specified in column (4) of the said table respectively.
The issue under consideration is whether the penalty u/s 271C levied due to failure to deduct tax at source (TDS) on LTA paid to employee is justified in law?
