Corporate Law : सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने Justdial लिमिटेड बनाम पीएन विग्नेश मा...
Corporate Law : SC slams High Court for 'playing it safe' on bail in Manish Sisodia's case, emphasizing that bail should be the norm, not the exce...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court quashes rape case, ruling consensual relationship. Calls for legal reforms to prevent misuse of penal laws against m...
Corporate Law : सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने राज्य बार काउंसिलों द्वारा अत्य...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore critical GST case laws from July 2024, including SCN issuance, personal hearing rights, appeal delays, and more. Essential...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Supreme Court's scrutiny of whether supplying cranes for services like loading, unloading, lifting, and shifting qualifies...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the case of Pradeep Kanthed v. Union of India where the Supreme Court issues notice to the Finance Ministry regarding the ...
Income Tax : Supreme Court rules Vodafone Idea is not liable for TDS on payments to foreign telecom operators. The decision aligns with earlier...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court overrules India Cement case, ruling that MADA judgment should not be applied retrospectively to avoid disrupting pas...
Goods and Services Tax : Supreme Court held that the Purchase Price as defined u/s. 2(18) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 would not include purcha...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that Banks/ Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) are obliged to adopt restructuring process of MSME as conte...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that State Bar Councils (SBCs) cannot charge an enrolment fee or miscellaneous fees above the amount prescribed...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
Income Tax : Supreme Court's circular outlines guidelines for filing written submissions, documents, and oral arguments before Constitution Ben...
Corporate Law : The establishment M/s Radhika Theatre, situated at Warangal, Telangana was covered under ESI Act w.e.f. 16.01.1981 on the basis of...
SC in the Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi, concerning entitlement to eviction and mesne profits based on various documents such as power of attorney, will, agreement to sell, possession memo, and sale consideration receipts
Article explains latest judgement of Indian Apex Court that the RBI’s Master Directions on Fraud must adhere to the principles of natural justice when classifying a borrower’s account as fraud. This analysis breaks down the judgement, its impacts, and what it means for borrowers. The article also dissects the principles of natural justice and their application to the Master Directions, particularly the right to be heard and the right to reputation. A must-read for those interested in Indian banking regulation and natural justice.
A landmark judgment by Supreme Court of India emphasizing importance of prompt adjudication in show cause notices, as seen in ATA Freight Line Vs Union of India case.
Supreme Court held that Order giving substantial amendment cannot be said to be clarificatory in nature and accordingly, such amendment cannot be given retrospective effect.
Case study examines Trade Refuse Charges (TRC) collected by BMC in Mumbai from businesses within its municipal area based on a circular.
Supreme Court held that for calculating limitation period for filing an appeal to NCLAT, the date on which order was pronounced and the time taken to provide certified copy is to be excluded.
Supreme Court held that User Development Fee (UDF) is in the form of ‘tax or cess’ collected for financing the cost of future projects and is not a consideration for services provided by the assessee to the customer, visitors, passengers, vendors etc.
Supreme Court reaffirmed that Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be invoked against third parties and that civil remedies available under the law must be pursued for recovery of dues from such parties.
Delve into the Supreme Court judgment on procedural defects and substantive rights in the case of Ramnath Exports Pvt Ltd Vs Vinita Mehta. Learn about the implications of procedural irregularities on litigants’ rights.
Explore the impact of the Vidya Drolia judgment on the jurisdiction of arbitration tribunals in deciding the existence and validity of arbitration agreements. Understand the evolving landscape post the 2015 amendment and conflicting decisions shaping the scope of judicial intervention in pre-arbitral disputes.
