Income Tax : Learn key tax rulings on Section 54/54F exemptions for property sales, including land size, appurtenant land, property use, and ag...
Finance : Understand real estate tax changes post-Budget 2024, including LTCG tax reduction, removal of indexation benefits, and rollover pr...
Income Tax : Learn how recent amendments to Section 112 of the Income Tax Act impact capital gains tax, including indexation rollback and new t...
Income Tax : 1. Further to the article Capital Gain Tax Exemption on Residential Property: Land Mark Judgment PART A, This article delves into ...
Income Tax : Explore landmark judgments on capital gain tax exemptions under Sections 54 and 54F of the Income Tax Act. Key highlights from ITA...
Income Tax : Representation against Extension of time limit under section 54 to 54GB without extension of Income Tax Return due date Vidarbha I...
CA, CS, CMA, Income Tax : We have not noticed any heed being extended towards various issues and possible solutions we have proposed through those represent...
Income Tax : KSCAA has requested to Hon’ble Minister of Finance to extend various time limits under section 54 to 54GB of the Income-tax Act,...
Income Tax : All India Federation of Tax Practitioners (CZ) has requested CBDT that due date of filing return of income u/s 139(1) for all the ...
Income Tax : Direct Taxes Committee of ICAI has Request(s) for extension of various due dates under Income-tax Act, 1961 especially Tax Audit R...
Goods and Services Tax : The petitioner raised bills on respondent No.4 based on the works executed from time to time, TDS @ 2% on the total value of the b...
Goods and Services Tax : In W.P.No.6541 of 2022, the petitioner has challenged the Circular No.125/44/2019 dated 18.11.2019 issued by the third respondent ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai dismisses ITO's appeal against Pamela Pritam Ghosh, upholding Section 54 exemption for property purchase in Australia ...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court held that notification no. 9 of 2022, Central Tax (Rate) is effective only from 18.07.2022 and hence ref...
Income Tax : ITAT held that the Allotment of New Flat did not fall within the scope of Section 56(2)(x), as the new flat was received in exchan...
Income Tax : For claiming exemption Section 54 to 54 GB of the Act, for which last date falls between 01st April. 2021 to 28th February, 2022 m...
Income Tax : Vide Income Tax Notification No. 35/2020 dated 24.06.2020 govt extends Due date for ITR for FY 2018-19 upto 31.07.2020, Last...
Income Tax : Notification No. 44/2012-Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 54, sub-section (2) of secti...
ITAT Mumbai held that damage on account of right to sue is a capital receipt and accordingly not chargeable to tax.
A deep dive into CESTAT Kolkata’s ruling in Commissioner of Customs Vs K.K. Woollens, where the court confirmed penalties for undetermined imports of used clothes.
Dive into the legal complexities of the Commissioner of Customs Vs S K P Enterprises case (CESTAT Kolkata), which revolves around the import of restricted old and used clothing. Get insights on why CESTAT dismissed the appeal for enhanced fines.
ITAT Delhi held that held that benefit of indexed cost of acquisition should be available to assessee based on payments made. Accordingly, AO directed to re-compute gain.
Explore GST refund provisions, fraudulent refund schemes, and legal battles. An in-depth analysis of relevant cases and the refund process.
Delhi High Court’s landmark judgment in Shalini Mittal Vs ITO case, quashing the income tax notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2018-19.
ITAT Delhi held that deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act is allowable based on handing over of possession and not based on payment of consideration. Date of handing over of possession of new property is relevant for deduction u/s. 54.
ITAT Bangalore held that TDS are not applicable as EPFO have not provided rent free accommodation to employees, as employees are paying license fees as per Rules of Govt. of India.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the expenses incurred to remove impediments or encumbrances in way of transfer of capital asset has to be allowed as deduction under the head ‘cost of improvement’ while computing taxable amount of capital gain.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee claimed benefit u/s 54 on a different document, whereas ultimately the transaction completed on altogether a different set of conditions and property, which is not permissible to claim benefit u/s. 54 of the Act. Accordingly, benefit u/s. 54 denied.
